Update for Edmunds V2

[rfink]

Update library to allow V2 usage.

[rfink]

Planning on doing this within the next 2 weeks or so, please stay tuned.

[vbezruchkin]

Hey, do you have any news on this?

Thanks

[philooo2]

I would be very interested as well ;)

Phil

[sunnysideup]

me too!

[rfink]

Wow, I didn't realize there was still much interest in this project. Thanks everyone for commenting. The reason this hasn't pushed forward is that I don't do as much side work that leverages this now. But if there's still interest, which there seems to be, maybe I can come up with a plan for releasing a new version. Any suggestions?

[philooo2]

I am definitely willing to chip $ in
Phil

On Sunday, January 24, 2016, rfink notifications@github.com wrote:

Wow, I didn't realize there was still much interest in this project.
Thanks guys for commenting. The reason this hasn't pushed forward is that I
don't do as much side work that leverages this now. But if there's still
interest, which there seems to be, maybe I can come up with a plan for
releasing a new version. Any suggestions?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#1 (comment)
.

[sunnysideup]

I am using this code at the moment: https://github.com/coderstephen/edmunds-sdk. I am also happy to help with development if needed. https://github.com/coderstephen/edmunds-sdk works ok for me for now, but it might be an idea to look at the strengths of both.

I am just thinking about a simple way forward. This is definitely a great code base in that it has lots of tests and that it uses a lot of third-party code.

[rfink]

Is there anything from the other library that seems like something we should carry over to this one?