Add support for versioned x86_64 arches #4
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Recently Red Hat introduced versioned x86_64 arches support in RPM:
x86_64_v2x86_64_v3x86_64_v4.In terms of RPM macros they are different to
x86_64and should be specifically mentioned in ifarch-like conditions.Hopefully, since Fedora 39 and CS10 there is
%{x86_64}macro available:This PR adds versioned x86_64 arches support by replacing
x86_64with%{x86_64}where necessary.But this should be only considered if no more major efi-rpm-macros updates expected in Fedora 38 and RHEL/CS 8/9.
If they are expected then different approach is necessary.