Skip to content

propose a gpu-offload project extension #340

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 22, 2025
Merged

propose a gpu-offload project extension #340

merged 4 commits into from
Jul 22, 2025

Conversation

ZuseZ4
Copy link
Member

@ZuseZ4 ZuseZ4 commented Jul 17, 2025

| Task owners | <!-- TASK OWNERS --> |
| Status | Proposed |
| Tracking issue | [rust-lang/rust-project-goals#109] |
| Other tracking issues | [rust-lang/rust#124509], [rust-lang/rust#124509] |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ZuseZ4 the same issue is listed twice. Is there a separate tracking issue or should we remove the extra?

@tomassedovic
Copy link
Contributor

I'm happy to merge, just a little curious about the duplicate in Other tracking issues. Seems to have been brought in from the previous goal so I'm not too bothered.

Copy link
Contributor

@traviscross traviscross left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great. Exciting work.

Copy link
Contributor

@nikomatsakis nikomatsakis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM modulo the question from @tomassedovic

@nikomatsakis nikomatsakis merged commit f48b4bf into main Jul 22, 2025
2 checks passed
@lqd lqd deleted the rustc-offload branch July 22, 2025 17:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants