This directory contains comprehensive documentation for the qwen-prompts project, including performance benchmarks, evaluation studies, sample outputs, and supporting assets.
Comprehensive documentation for all 45 qwen-code custom slash commands organized by functional category.
- analyze:dependency - Project dependency analysis across multiple package managers
- analyze:implementation - Feature implementation analysis and coverage assessment
- analyze:performance - Performance bottleneck identification and optimization recommendations
- analyze:repo - Comprehensive repository analysis with statistics and insights
- analyze:security - Comprehensive security analysis and vulnerability assessment (professional reports by default, use
--comprehensivefor detailed technical analysis) - analyze:tech-debt - Technical debt analysis and prioritization matrix
- analyze:vulnerabilities - Dependency vulnerability analysis with scanning guidance
- code:analysis - Comprehensive codebase architecture and structure analysis (professional reports by default, use
--comprehensivefor detailed technical analysis) - code:quality - Code quality analysis including maintainability and best practices
- code:review - Comprehensive code review with severity-based findings
- compare:dirs - Directory structure and architecture comparison
- compare:files - Detailed file-level comparison and analysis
- create:cost-analysis - Project cost analysis generator from TDD specifications
- create:prd - Product Requirements Document generator
- create:sprint - Sprint plan generator with automated project analysis
- create:tdd - Technical Design Document generator from PRD
- create:tutorial - Codebase tutorial generator with real examples
- docs:create-standard - Documentation standard and template creator
- docs:generate-from-standard - Documentation generator using established standards
- docs:update-standard - Documentation standard updater and formatter
- find:patterns - Code pattern discovery and anti-pattern identification
- initialize:coding-rules - Platform-specific coding rules generator
- initialize:coding-standard - Base coding standard template creator
- initialize:gitignore - Language-specific .gitignore generator
- initialize:planning - Project planning structure setup
- initialize:update-coding-rules - Coding rules update manager
- file:save - Response content saver for preserving previous command's output
- file:merge - File merging utility for consolidating multiple files
- file:delete - Safe file and directory deletion with confirmation
- git:add - Stage files for commit with intelligent staging
- git:add:fast - Quick file staging without analysis
- git:branch - Branch management and operations
- git:commit - Commit using project standards or conventional format
- git:commit:fast - Quick commit without standards checking
- git:merge - Branch merging with conflict resolution
- git:pull - Pull changes from remote repository
- git:push - Push changes to remote repository
- git:status - Repository status with detailed analysis
- git:status:fast - Quick repository status check
- single:analyze:security - Single-shot security analysis for benchmarking
- single:code:analysis - Single-shot code analysis for benchmarking
- strategy:extract-business-logic - Business logic extraction and documentation
- strategy:plan - Strategic planning and implementation guidance
- test:coverage - Test coverage analysis and improvement recommendations
- test:review-and-correct - Comprehensive test suite review and correction
Performance analysis and comparison data between hybrid prompt chaining and single-shot approaches.
comprehensive-benchmarks.md- Complete benchmark analysis across 6 repositories showing hybrid prompt chaining performance advantages (11/12 test cases with 19-72% time reduction and 36-83% token efficiency gains)benchmark-table.html- Interactive HTML visualization of performance comparison data
Qualitative assessments and expert evaluations of AI-generated outputs.
sprint-plan-evaluation.md- Professional evaluation comparing hybrid vs single-shot sprint planning outputs, scored by an Agile Program Manager (52/60 vs 42/60, demonstrating superior actionability and delivery confidence)
Visual assets and diagrams used in documentation and articles.
performance-comparison-chart.png- Performance comparison visualization showing hybrid prompt chaining advantages across key metrics (execution time, token usage, success rate)
Real-world examples of command outputs demonstrating practical applications.
sprint.md- Example hybrid prompt chaining sprint plan output showing comprehensive project analysis, detailed task breakdown, and actionable implementation steps
- Contains single-shot command outputs for comparison with hybrid approaches
- Quick Reference Guide - Command cheat sheet and common patterns
- Common Workflows - Step-by-step workflow examples for real-world scenarios
- Troubleshooting Guide - Solutions for common issues and problems
The documentation in this directory supports the core research findings:
- Performance: Hybrid prompt chaining achieves 19-72% faster execution through intelligent targeting
- Efficiency: 36-83% token reduction compared to brute-force single-prompt approaches
- Quality: 90% vs 75% delivery confidence with more actionable, project-specific outputs
- Consistency: 91.7% success rate across 12 comparison points
These documents serve multiple purposes:
- Research Validation - Reproducible benchmark data supporting hybrid workflow claims
- Quality Assessment - Expert evaluations demonstrating output superiority
- Implementation Examples - Real command outputs showing practical applications
- Visual Communication - Charts and diagrams for presentations and articles
When adding new documentation:
- Place benchmark data in
/benchmarks/ - Add evaluation studies to
/evaluations/ - Store visual assets in
/images/(prefer SVG format when possible) - Include sample outputs in appropriate
/sample-responses/subdirectories
- Main Repository - Complete qwen-prompts collection
- Commands - TOML configuration files for all available commands
- Security Policy - Important security guidelines for shell-integrated workflows
- 72% Faster AI Workflows: How Hybrid Prompt Chaining with Qwen Code and Gemini CLI Boosts Efficiency - "Hybrid Prompt Chaining combines Gemini CLI (fast context discovery and analysis) with Qwen Code (specialized synthesis and reporting). Benchmarks across six repositories showed it consistently outperforms single-shot prompts with: Up to 72% faster execution, 36–83% fewer tokens used, and 91.7% success rate across tests" on dev.to
For questions about the documentation or to report issues, please refer to the main repository's issue tracker.