Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
144 lines (106 loc) · 9.25 KB

File metadata and controls

144 lines (106 loc) · 9.25 KB

Documentation

This directory contains comprehensive documentation for the qwen-prompts project, including performance benchmarks, evaluation studies, sample outputs, and supporting assets.

Directory Structure

/commands/

Comprehensive documentation for all 45 qwen-code custom slash commands organized by functional category.

Analysis Commands

  • analyze:dependency - Project dependency analysis across multiple package managers
  • analyze:implementation - Feature implementation analysis and coverage assessment
  • analyze:performance - Performance bottleneck identification and optimization recommendations
  • analyze:repo - Comprehensive repository analysis with statistics and insights
  • analyze:security - Comprehensive security analysis and vulnerability assessment (professional reports by default, use --comprehensive for detailed technical analysis)
  • analyze:tech-debt - Technical debt analysis and prioritization matrix
  • analyze:vulnerabilities - Dependency vulnerability analysis with scanning guidance

Code Quality Commands

  • code:analysis - Comprehensive codebase architecture and structure analysis (professional reports by default, use --comprehensive for detailed technical analysis)
  • code:quality - Code quality analysis including maintainability and best practices
  • code:review - Comprehensive code review with severity-based findings

Comparison Commands

Content Creation Commands

Documentation Commands

Search & Discovery Commands

  • find:patterns - Code pattern discovery and anti-pattern identification

Project Initialization Commands

File Management Commands

  • file:save - Response content saver for preserving previous command's output
  • file:merge - File merging utility for consolidating multiple files
  • file:delete - Safe file and directory deletion with confirmation

Git Commands

  • git:add - Stage files for commit with intelligent staging
  • git:add:fast - Quick file staging without analysis
  • git:branch - Branch management and operations
  • git:commit - Commit using project standards or conventional format
  • git:commit:fast - Quick commit without standards checking
  • git:merge - Branch merging with conflict resolution
  • git:pull - Pull changes from remote repository
  • git:push - Push changes to remote repository
  • git:status - Repository status with detailed analysis
  • git:status:fast - Quick repository status check

Benchmarking Commands

Strategic Planning Commands

Testing Commands

/benchmarks/

Performance analysis and comparison data between hybrid prompt chaining and single-shot approaches.

  • comprehensive-benchmarks.md - Complete benchmark analysis across 6 repositories showing hybrid prompt chaining performance advantages (11/12 test cases with 19-72% time reduction and 36-83% token efficiency gains)
  • benchmark-table.html - Interactive HTML visualization of performance comparison data

/evaluations/

Qualitative assessments and expert evaluations of AI-generated outputs.

  • sprint-plan-evaluation.md - Professional evaluation comparing hybrid vs single-shot sprint planning outputs, scored by an Agile Program Manager (52/60 vs 42/60, demonstrating superior actionability and delivery confidence)

/images/

Visual assets and diagrams used in documentation and articles.

  • performance-comparison-chart.png - Performance comparison visualization showing hybrid prompt chaining advantages across key metrics (execution time, token usage, success rate)

/sample-responses/

Real-world examples of command outputs demonstrating practical applications.

/sample-responses/create/

  • sprint.md - Example hybrid prompt chaining sprint plan output showing comprehensive project analysis, detailed task breakdown, and actionable implementation steps

/sample-responses/single/create/

  • Contains single-shot command outputs for comparison with hybrid approaches

Quick Reference Materials

Key Findings Summary

The documentation in this directory supports the core research findings:

  • Performance: Hybrid prompt chaining achieves 19-72% faster execution through intelligent targeting
  • Efficiency: 36-83% token reduction compared to brute-force single-prompt approaches
  • Quality: 90% vs 75% delivery confidence with more actionable, project-specific outputs
  • Consistency: 91.7% success rate across 12 comparison points

Usage

These documents serve multiple purposes:

  1. Research Validation - Reproducible benchmark data supporting hybrid workflow claims
  2. Quality Assessment - Expert evaluations demonstrating output superiority
  3. Implementation Examples - Real command outputs showing practical applications
  4. Visual Communication - Charts and diagrams for presentations and articles

Contributing

When adding new documentation:

  • Place benchmark data in /benchmarks/
  • Add evaluation studies to /evaluations/
  • Store visual assets in /images/ (prefer SVG format when possible)
  • Include sample outputs in appropriate /sample-responses/ subdirectories

Related Resources

For questions about the documentation or to report issues, please refer to the main repository's issue tracker.