feat: added relevant links

Author: Ghadi8

src/ens-best-practices/README.md

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ ENS maps human-readable names like 'alice.eth' to machine-readable identifiers s
 
 ## Key Takeaway for ENS
 
-To securely implement ENS in your applications, prioritize direct L1 data verification, enforce proper name normalization, and validate bidirectional resolution. Always verify interface support before interaction, respect chain-specific cointype parameters, and implement CCIP-Read functionality correctly. These practices prevent address spoofing, ensure cross-chain compatibility, and maintain data integrity throughout the ENS ecosystem.
+To securely implement ENS in your applications, prioritize direct L1 data verification, enforce proper name normalization, and validate bidirectional resolution. Always verify interface support before interaction, respect chain-specific cointype parameters, and implement [CCIP-Read](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3668) functionality correctly. These practices prevent address spoofing, ensure cross-chain compatibility, and maintain data integrity throughout the ENS ecosystem.
 
 ## What This Framework Covers
 
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ This best practices framework includes guidance on:
 * **Data Integrity & Verification** - Ensuring reliable and secure name resolution
 * **Cross-Chain Compatibility** - Supporting ENS across multiple blockchain networks
 * **Smart Contract Integration** - Leveraging ENS in smart contract systems
-* **Interface Compliance** - Correctly implementing and verifying ENS interfaces
+* **Interface Compliance** - Correctly implementing and [verifying ENS interfaces](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-165)
 * **Name Handling & Normalization** - Properly processing and displaying ENS names
 
 These recommendations are designed for developers integrating ENS into applications, wallets, smart contracts, or other blockchain systems. Following these practices will help create more secure, reliable, and user-friendly ENS implementations.

src/ens-best-practices/cross-chain-compatibility.md

@@ -6,13 +6,12 @@ tags:
 
 # Cross-Chain Compatibility
 
-## Respect Cointype for Chain-Specific Resolution
+## Respect Cointype for [Chain-Specific Resolution](https://docs.ens.domains/ensip/9)
 
 - Always use the correct cointype parameter when resolving addresses on specific chains
-- For EVM-compatible chains, implement optional fallback to cointype(60) when a specific cointype record doesn't exist, with prominent user warnings
-- When applying fallback resolution, prominently warn the user that the resolved address may not exist or be controlled by the same entity on the target chain, and require explicit user confirmation before proceeding
+- For EVM-compatible chains, derive cointypes from chain IDs according to [ENSIP-11](https://docs.ens.domains/ensip/11)
 
-**Rationale**: An ENS name can resolve to a different address for each different blockchain network, which ENS supports through the cointype field in address records (following SLIP-44 standards). With the rise of smart contract wallets and account abstraction, users may have different addresses across different chains. Failing to respect the cointype when resolving addresses can lead to funds being sent to addresses that don't exist on the target chain or that belong to different entities altogether. While fallback resolution to cointype(60) can improve user experience, it must be implemented with clear warnings about potential risks and require explicit user consent.
+**Rationale**: An ENS name can resolve to a different address for each different blockchain network, which ENS supports through the cointype field in address records (following SLIP-44 standards). With the rise of smart contract wallets and account abstraction, users may have different addresses across different chains. Failing to respect the cointype when resolving addresses can lead to funds being sent to addresses that don't exist on the target chain or that belong to different entities altogether.
 
 ## Implement CCIP-Read Support
 

src/ens-best-practices/data-integrity-verification.md

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ tags:
 
 **Rationale**: Indexers and third-party APIs may have delayed updates or inconsistencies that could lead to payments being sent to outdated or incorrect addresses. By querying L1 directly, applications work with the most current and authoritative ENS data, dramatically reducing the risk of misdirected funds. This is particularly crucial for high-value transactions where the consequences of using stale data could be severe.
 
-## Verify Forward Resolution on Reverse Records
+## Verify Forward Resolution on [Reverse Records](https://docs.ens.domains/ensip/3)
 
 - Always perform forward resolution on reverse records to verify address matches
 - Check that name → address → name completes a valid loop

src/ens-best-practices/name-handling-normalization.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ tags:
 
 # Name Handling & Normalization
 
-## Normalize Names per ENSIP-15
+## Normalize Names per [ENSIP-15](https://docs.ens.domains/ensip/15)
 - Always normalize ENS names before creating namehash, labelhash, or DNS-encoding
 - Use established libraries that correctly implement ENSIP-15 normalization (like @adraffy/ens-normalize)
 - Apply normalization at the earliest possible point in your ENS handling logic