Synthesized 2026-05-12. Sources at bottom.
Pricing (annual, EUR):
| Plan | Price/yr | Credits | Parallel jobs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | €0 | 1 credit | 2 |
| Academic Budget | €93.50 | 84 | 7 |
| Academic Standard | €185.90 | 168 | 14 |
| Academic | €280.50 | 300 | 30 |
| Professional | €880 | 720 | 60 |
| Enterprise A/B/C | €5,500-10,956 | 1,200-4,000 | 5-10 seats |
Implied credit cost ≈ €1.10-1.22 per credit at academic tier. Credits do not expire. Each job shows "Estimated Credits" before launch.
Tool catalog: Boltz-1, Chai-1, Protenix, AlphaFold2, RoseTTAFold2, DiffDock-L, GNINA, DynamicBind, FlowDock, ProteinMPNN, RFdiffusion2, GROMACS.
Strengths: broad tool catalog, no-card free tier for academics, built-in 3D viewer, persistent credits.
Weaknesses: opaque per-run cost until login; Euro pricing confuses US users; "unlimited storage" is soft-quota'd in practice.
Pricing hidden behind "Contact us". YC-backed, $13.6M Series A. Tools: AlphaFold, Chai-1, RFdiffusion, MPNN, GROMACS, Smina, EquiDock, GNINA, RFantibody.
Sentiment: free tier perceived as demo-only; reviewers cite "tens of thousands/year" for real use. Strong on antibody/binder tooling. Generally reads as enterprise-focused.
Runs Boltz-1 at $0.10/structure (21 min, includes complex cases). Public price floor for Boltz-class workloads. Not a full bio-SaaS — general compute that happens to host Boltz.
- NVIDIA BioNeMo — NIM microservices, opaque enterprise pricing.
- Lightning AI — general-purpose; ~$49/mo + $5-15/hr credits.
- Chai Discovery (hosted) — own free playground with rate limits. No marketplace.
- Helixon / OpenADMET / Inductive Bio — adjacent, not direct competitors.
Inferred from Neurosnap credit cost and observed runtimes:
| Tool | Typical runtime (H100) | Suggested user price | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boltz-2 | 2-8 min | $0.20 - $0.80 | Fovus floor = $0.10 |
| Protenix | 3-10 min | $0.40 - $1.20 | |
| Chai-1 | 2-6 min | $0.20 - $0.70 | Chai's own playground is free, rate-limited |
| DynamicBind | 5-20 min | $0.80 - $2.50 | License blocker for commercial |
| GNINA | 1-5 min (4090 OK) | $0.05 - $0.30 |
At our 1.5× cost-plus markup on RunPod Flex:
- GNINA 3-min on RTX 4090:
$1.10/hr × 0.05 hr × 1.5 = $0.083 - Boltz-2 5-min on H100:
$4.18/hr × 0.083 hr × 1.5 = $0.52 - Protenix 6-min on H100:
$4.18/hr × 0.1 hr × 1.5 = $0.63
Competitive with Fovus on Boltz; undercuts Neurosnap on transparency.
Three distinct products:
- Serverless Endpoints (mature) — Docker + handler, billed per-second. What we use.
- Hub — open-source model marketplace; beta. Not for custom docking.
- Flash (GA Apr 30 2026) — Pure-Python
@Endpointdecorator, no Docker. Limit: can't install conda-heavy stacks (OpenMM, RDKit). Wrong fit for our tools.
Flex pricing (May 2026):
| GPU | Flex $/sec | Active $/sec | $/hr Flex |
|---|---|---|---|
| B200 (180 GB) | $0.00240 | $0.00190 | $8.64 |
| H200 (141 GB) | $0.00155 | $0.00124 | $5.58 |
| H100 (80 GB) | $0.00116 | $0.00093 | $4.18 |
| A100 (80 GB) | $0.00076 | $0.00060 | $2.72 |
| L40S (48 GB) | $0.00053 | $0.00037 | $1.90 |
| RTX 4090 (24 GB) | $0.00031 | $0.00021 | $1.10 |
Network volume: $0.07/GB-mo (<1TB), $0.05 (>1TB), $0.14 (high-perf). No egress.
Cold starts: marketing claims sub-200ms for 48% of starts. Reality with 30+GB images + 5-50GB weights: 30-60s typical, 1-2min worst case.
SDK / cost capture: runpod.Endpoint(id).run(...) returns
{id, status, delayTime, executionTime, output}. Billed = executionTime on
Flex (queue time free). Multiply by GPU rate for exact cost.
Limits: /runsync max payload 20 MB. Async output retained 30 min.
Default max job time 600s, configurable to 7 days. Default 3 max workers per
endpoint (request increase).
Output > 20 MB: configure S3 upload — response becomes
{"type":"s3_url","data":"..."}. We use our own S3 bucket (dockvision-prod);
RunPod doesn't provide artifact storage.
- Modal — best DX, Python-native, ~$3.95/hr H100, 2-4s cold starts. Pricier, can't BYO datacenter. Real contender for v2.
- Replicate — $5.49/hr H100, great for public demos, weak for custom pipelines.
- Beam — ~$3.50/hr H100, Modal-like, smaller.
- Lambda Cloud — VM-style only, no scale-to-zero. Skip.
RunPod wins on per-second price and exact billed-seconds in response. Modal is a plausible v2 alternative if cold-start UX becomes a complaint.
Nobody in bio-SaaS does this. All competitors use forms/wizards. Closest precedent: Warp, Modal CLI, fly.io, replit shell. CASP audience is heavily Linux/bash-fluent — a CLI-style web UI is a real differentiator.
Risk: alienates wet-lab scientists. Mitigation: wizard <tool> drops
into form mode.
- Stripe Billing with metered events. 2026 AI-usage SKUs are the right primitive.
- Auth.js (formerly NextAuth) for SvelteKit — self-hosted, OSS, fits AGPL ethos. Clerk is the SaaS alternative if Auth.js becomes painful.
- Postgres for users/jobs/billing metadata. Trigger-maintained
storage_bytesdenorm. - AWS S3 for artifacts (co-located with www0 in us-east-1; free intra-region transfer; $0.09/GB egress to internet).
- Neurosnap pricing: graphstats.net/neurosnap-pricing; neurosnap.ai/services
- Tamarind pricing: tamarind.bio/pricing
- Fovus Boltz price: fovus.co/2025/03/03/achieving-cost-efficient-boltz-1-simulations
- RunPod docs: docs.runpod.io/serverless/pricing; runpod.io/pricing
- RunPod Flash launch: runpod.io/blog/flash-is-ga
- FlashBoot: runpod.io/blog/introducing-flashboot-serverless-cold-start
- Serverless GPU comparison: introl.com/blog/serverless-gpu-platforms-runpod-modal-beam-comparison-guide-2025
- BioStars Neurosnap vs Tamarind: biostars.org/p/9597524/
- Protein folding SaaS pricing: getmonetizely.com/articles/what-is-protein-folding-saas-and-how-to-navigate-biological-structure-prediction-pricing
- Boolean Biotech (AF3, Boltz, Chai-1 overview): blog.booleanbiotech.com/alphafold3-boltz-chai1