Skip to content

HR Performance Reviews, Positions, Scales and Criteria Relationships. Something missing? #923

@pakricard

Description

@pakricard

Hi:

IRL, the criteria used to evaluate a position's performance differs from another position. Example: Salesman is usually reviewed on sales performance, sales goals achievements, etc. and the accounting manager is probably evaluated in report preparation, errors detected, etc and the production team is reviewed about components leftovers, delays on WO's, etc.

In webERP we can define the criteria (all of them) in HRPerformanceCriteria.php, and we can assign them a weight (%).

In HRPerformnceRatings.php, we can evaluate an employee against ALL available criteria, not only the criteria related to his/her position.

So, I guess we need something so group the criteria by position (and should end up with a total weight of 100%) , and then in HRPerformanceRatings.php only show the criteria related to the position of the employee.

The Rating Scale should be linked to the criteria, not to the performance review, as any given criteria, requires a consistent scale to be measured.

Then, in HRPerformanceReviews.php, Rating Scale should not be used, as it should be linked to the criteria itself.

R

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions