Hi,
The PDF output from the groupChromPeaks tool (XCMS suit) when using the PeakDensity method does not respond to the maxFeature parameter, and is not responding well to the minFraction (and potentially the minSamples) parameter.
Investigations led me to the plotChromPeakDensity function from the XCMS package, so I opened an issue on there package repository.
Following what may happen, a correction may be done on a future version of XCMS, but as we are still using XCMS 3 in the Galaxy tool, we may not benefit from the update for current versions. Consequently, would it be ok to provide a specific fix for the Galaxy module by kind of "duplicating the corrected version of the function" in lib.r for example, and replace the call to plotChromPeakDensity by the new "fixed" function?
I have no idea if it is a valid-enough solution, and if there are other alternatives that would be better.
Mélanie
Hi,
The PDF output from the groupChromPeaks tool (XCMS suit) when using the PeakDensity method does not respond to the maxFeature parameter, and is not responding well to the minFraction (and potentially the minSamples) parameter.
Investigations led me to the plotChromPeakDensity function from the XCMS package, so I opened an issue on there package repository.
Following what may happen, a correction may be done on a future version of XCMS, but as we are still using XCMS 3 in the Galaxy tool, we may not benefit from the update for current versions. Consequently, would it be ok to provide a specific fix for the Galaxy module by kind of "duplicating the corrected version of the function" in lib.r for example, and replace the call to plotChromPeakDensity by the new "fixed" function?
I have no idea if it is a valid-enough solution, and if there are other alternatives that would be better.
Mélanie