-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathmt2.tex
More file actions
154 lines (131 loc) · 7.88 KB
/
mt2.tex
File metadata and controls
154 lines (131 loc) · 7.88 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
\frfilename{mt2.tex}
\versiondate{24.2.16}
\noindent{\bf Introduction to Volume 2}
\medskip
For this second volume I have chosen seven topics through which to
explore the insights and challenges offered by measure theory. Some,
like the Radon-Nikod\'ym theorem (Chapter 23) are necessary for any
understanding of the structure of the subject; others, like Fourier
analysis (Chapter 28) and the discussion of function spaces (Chapter 24)
demonstrate the power of measure theory to attack problems in general
real and functional analysis. But all have applications outside
measure theory, and all have influenced its development. These are the
parts of measure theory which any analyst may find himself using.
Every topic is one which ideally one would wish undergraduates to have
seen, but the length of this volume makes it plain that no ordinary
undergraduate
course could include very much of it. It is directed rather at graduate
level, where I hope it will be found adequate to support all but the most
ambitious courses in measure theory, though it is perhaps a bit too solid
to be suitable for direct
use as a course text, except with careful selection of the parts to be
covered. If you are using it to teach yourself measure theory, I
strongly recommend an eclectic approach, looking for particular subjects
and theorems that seem startling or useful, and working backwards from
them. My other objective, of course, is to provide an account of the
central ideas at this level in measure theory, rather fuller than can
easily be found in one volume elsewhere. I cannot claim that it is
`definitive', but I do think I cover a good deal of ground in ways that
provide a firm foundation for further study. As in Volume 1, I usually
do not shrink from giving `best' results, like Lindeberg's condition
for the Central Limit Theorem (\S274), or the theory of products of
arbitrary measure spaces (\S251).
If I were teaching this material to students in a PhD programme
I would rather accept a limitation in the breadth of the course than
leave them unaware of what could be done in the areas discussed.
The topics interact in complex ways -- one of the purposes of this book
is to exhibit their relationships. There is no canonical linear
ordering in which they should be taken. Nor do I think organization
charts are very helpful, not least because it may be only two or three
paragraphs in a section which are needed for a given chapter later on.
I do at least try to lay the material of each section out in an order
which makes initial segments useful by themselves. But the order in
which to take the chapters is to a considerable extent for you to
choose, perhaps after a glance at their individual introductions. I
have done my best to pitch the exposition at much the same level
throughout the volume, sometimes allowing gradients to steepen in the
course of a chapter or a section, but always trying to return to
something which anyone who has mastered Volume 1 ought to be able to
cope with. (Though perhaps the main theorems of Chapter 26 are harder
work than the principal results elsewhere, and \S286 is only for the most
determined.)
I said there were seven topics, and you will see eight chapters ahead of
you. This is because Chapter 21 is rather different from the rest.
It is the purest of pure measure theory, and is here only because there
are places later in the volume where (in my view) the theorems make
sense only in the light of some abstract concepts which are not
particularly difficult, but are also not obvious. However it is fair
to say that the most important ideas of this volume do not really depend
on the work of Chapter 21.
As always, it is a puzzle to know how much prior knowledge to assume in
this volume. I do of course call on the results of Volume 1 of this
treatise whenever they seem to be relevant. I do not doubt, however,
that there will be readers who have learnt the elementary theory from
other sources. Provided you can, from first principles, construct
Lebesgue measure and prove the basic convergence theorems for integrals
on arbitrary measure spaces, you ought to be able to embark on the
present volume. Perhaps it would be helpful to have in hand the
results-only version of Volume 1, since that includes the most important
definitions as well as statements of the theorems.
There is also the question of how much material from outside measure
theory is needed. Chapter 21 calls for some non-trivial set theory
(given in \S2A1), but the more advanced ideas are needed only for the
counter-examples in \S216, and can be passed over to begin with. The
problems become acute in Chapter 24. Here we need a variety of results
from functional analysis, some of them depending on non-trivial ideas in
general topology. For a full understanding of this material there is
no substitute for a course in normed spaces up to and including a study
of weak compactness. But I do not like to insist on such a
preparation, because it is likely to be simultaneously too much and too
little. Too much, because I hardly mention linear operators at this
stage; too little, because I do ask for some of the theory of
non-locally-convex spaces, which is often omitted in first courses on
functional analysis. At the risk, therefore, of wasting paper, I have
written out condensed accounts of the essential facts
(\S\S2A3-2A5). %\S2A3 \S2A4 \S2A5
\bigskip
\noindent{\bf Note on second printing, April 2003}
\medskip
For the second printing of this volume, I have made two substantial
corrections to inadequate proofs and a large number of minor amendments;
I am most grateful to T.D.Austin for his careful reading of the first
printing. In addition, I have added a dozen exercises and a handful of
straightforward results which turn out to be relevant to the work of
later volumes and fit naturally here.
The regular process of revision of this work has led me to make a couple
of notational innovations not described explicitly in the early printings
of Volume 1. I trust that most readers will find these immediately
comprehensible. If, however, you find that there is a puzzling
cross-reference which you are unable to match with anything in the
version of Volume 1 which you are using, it may be worth while checking
the errata pages in {\tt
http://www.essex.ac.uk/maths/people/fremlin/mterr.htm}.
\bigskip
\noindent{\bf Note on hardback edition, January 2010}
\medskip
For the new (`Lulu') edition of this volume, I have eliminated a number of
further errors; no doubt many remain. There are many new exercises,
several new theorems
%214P, 222L Dini derivates, half of \S234, 244O, 251L, \S266, 272Q, 272W
and some corresponding rearrangements of material.
%\S234
The new results are mostly additions with little effect on the structure of
the work, but there is a short new section (\S266) on the Brunn-Minkowski
inequality.
\bigskip
\noindent{\bf Note on second printing of hardback edition, April 2016}
\medskip
There is the usual crop of small mistakes to be corrected, and assorted minor
amendments and additions. But my principal reason for issuing a new printed
version is a major fault in the proof of Carleson's theorem, where an imprudent
move to simplify the argument of {\smc Lacey \& Thiele 00} was based on an
undergraduate error\footnote{I am most
grateful to A.Derighetti for bringing this to my attention}.
While the blunder is conspicuous enough, a resolution
seems to require an adjustment in a definition, and is not a fair demand on
a graduate seminar, the intended readership for this material.
Furthermore, the proof was supposed to be a distinguishing feature of not
only this volume, but of the treatise as a whole. So, with apologies to any
who retired hurt from an encounter with the original version, I present a
revision which I hope is essentially sound.
\frnewpage