-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 254
chore(portfolio-contract): Improve "toUSDN" comments #12080
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
gibson042
wants to merge
2
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
gibson-2025-10-ymax-subtract-bps
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
consider something like:
I think that might already be in ERTP somewhere.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
also, "subtract" seems like an odd name. We're multiplying by a ratio, right?
Is there a particular reason we're not using ERTP amounts and ratios?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't find suitable code in ERTP, but if you know of some then a pointer would be valuable regardless of this PR's fate.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ERTP/src/ratio.js has, for example,
floorMultiplyBy.It also has
const PERCENT = 100n;though it's not exported.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As to
BASIS_POINT, we seem to use a constant but not bother importing it from a common source:and
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks.
floorMultiplyByis definitely correct, but the domain being Amounts rather than Nats makes it far too cumbersome here. We could consider extending packages/ERTP/src/safeMath.js, but honestlyapplyHaircutis so straightforward that it seems fine as an isolated one-off, and would continue to exist here even if there were a nat-basedfloorMultiplyBy(becauseapplyHaircut(flow, feeInBasisPoints)is much more clear thanfloorMultiplyBy(flow, makeRatio(BASIS_POINTS - feeInBasisPoints, BASIS_POINTS))).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok...
I'm just uneasy about reviewing / maintaining more of this code.