use implementation nbs as ref docs instead of separate #60
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Found 3 changed notebooks. Review the changes at https://app.gitnotebooks.com/AnswerDotAI/plash_cli/pull/60 |
|
📖 Documentation Preview: https://plash-docs-pr-60.pla.sh |
Not sure why, but underscores in the docstrings aren't showing up properly. Besides that it looks good! |
|
Thanks, it was a typo. fixed it. 
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently we have a separate notebook for the reference docs. I refactor things so we can use the actual notebooks that implement the plash_cli package as the reference docs just like nbdev suggests.