-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 622
Attach additional volume for postgres, #4210
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
@@ -13,9 +13,11 @@ import ( | |||||||
corev1 "k8s.io/api/core/v1" | ||||||||
"k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/api/resource" | ||||||||
"k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/rand" | ||||||||
"k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/sets" | ||||||||
|
||||||||
"github.com/crunchydata/postgres-operator/internal/initialize" | ||||||||
"github.com/crunchydata/postgres-operator/internal/naming" | ||||||||
"github.com/crunchydata/postgres-operator/pkg/apis/postgres-operator.crunchydata.com/v1beta1" | ||||||||
) | ||||||||
|
||||||||
var tmpDirSizeLimit = resource.MustParse("16Mi") | ||||||||
|
@@ -285,3 +287,61 @@ func safeHash32(content func(w io.Writer) error) (string, error) { | |||||||
} | ||||||||
return rand.SafeEncodeString(fmt.Sprint(hash.Sum32())), nil | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
|
||||||||
// AdditionalVolumeMount returns the name and mount path of the additional volume. | ||||||||
func AdditionalVolumeMount(name string, readOnly bool) corev1.VolumeMount { | ||||||||
return corev1.VolumeMount{ | ||||||||
Name: fmt.Sprintf("volumes-%s", name), | ||||||||
MountPath: "/volumes/" + name, | ||||||||
ReadOnly: readOnly, | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
|
||||||||
// addAdditionalVolumesToSpecifiedContainers adds additional volumes to the specified | ||||||||
// containers in the specified pod | ||||||||
// addAdditionalVolumesToSpecifiedContainers adds the volumes to the pod | ||||||||
// as `volumes-<additionalVolumeRequest.Name>` | ||||||||
// and adds the directory to the path `/volumes/<additionalVolumeRequest.Name>` | ||||||||
func addAdditionalVolumesToSpecifiedContainers(template *corev1.PodTemplateSpec, | ||||||||
additionalVolumes []v1beta1.AdditionalVolume) { | ||||||||
|
||||||||
for _, additionalVolumeRequest := range additionalVolumes { | ||||||||
|
||||||||
additionalVolumeMount := AdditionalVolumeMount( | ||||||||
additionalVolumeRequest.Name, | ||||||||
additionalVolumeRequest.ReadOnly, | ||||||||
) | ||||||||
|
||||||||
additionalVolume := corev1.Volume{ | ||||||||
Name: additionalVolumeMount.Name, | ||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. 🤔 Ah, hmm. Volume names must be unique in a pod. What happens If someone uses 🤔 🤔 What other (Pod) validation happens on this name in K8s? Maybe a limit on the length? postgres-operator/internal/postgres/reconcile.go Lines 26 to 28 in 6a30d72
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. For the pod.spec.volumes, its says "Must be a DNS_LABEL and unique within the pod." (cite) That's what the code comment says, at least. +1 for a prefix that prevents other problems |
||||||||
VolumeSource: corev1.VolumeSource{ | ||||||||
PersistentVolumeClaim: &corev1.PersistentVolumeClaimVolumeSource{ | ||||||||
ClaimName: additionalVolumeRequest.ClaimName, | ||||||||
ReadOnly: additionalVolumeMount.ReadOnly, | ||||||||
}, | ||||||||
}, | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
|
||||||||
names := sets.New(additionalVolumeRequest.Containers...) | ||||||||
|
||||||||
for i := range template.Spec.Containers { | ||||||||
if names.Len() == 0 || names.Has(template.Spec.Containers[i].Name) { | ||||||||
template.Spec.Containers[i].VolumeMounts = append( | ||||||||
template.Spec.Containers[i].VolumeMounts, | ||||||||
additionalVolumeMount) | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
|
||||||||
for i := range template.Spec.InitContainers { | ||||||||
if names.Len() == 0 || names.Has(template.Spec.InitContainers[i].Name) { | ||||||||
template.Spec.InitContainers[i].VolumeMounts = append( | ||||||||
template.Spec.InitContainers[i].VolumeMounts, | ||||||||
additionalVolumeMount) | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
|
||||||||
template.Spec.Volumes = append( | ||||||||
Comment on lines
+327
to
+343
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. If the PVC specified by the user doesn't actually exist, what happens? I'm pretty sure that the Pod will break in some fashion... Do we want to provide any protection from this footgun? 🤔 There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. If the PVC doesn't exist, the pod will not be scheduled and we get a warning event from K8s:
It might be nice to check if the PVCs exist, but we don't really do anything for those areas in our spec where we allow a user to specify a preexisting volume (or configmap, secret, etc.). (I do kind of like the idea of checking the env before accepting a postgrescluster spec, but that's not really what we do.) |
||||||||
template.Spec.Volumes, | ||||||||
additionalVolume) | ||||||||
Comment on lines
+343
to
+345
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This is probably fine, but just to clarify, it seems we will always add the volume even if we don't mount it to any containers (which would only happen if the user specifies a container(s) but none of the containers specified actually exist in the pod)... Do we want to warn the user in any way if any of the containers they've specified don't exist? 🤔 Seems unlikely the user would do this on purpose, but if they misspell/typo their container name and don't realize it... There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yeah, it's funny, I was just talking with Andrew earlier in the week about how some people might want to not add the volume to any containers through our system, but mount them manually through, say, the sidecar container spec. But we don't actually let people mount to no containers: we have some (list the containers) and all (a blank list). Should we add a "none" option or special keyword? But yeah, right now, we have (a) no way to skip mounting and (b) no validation on the containers being present. Now if I mispell "database" when trying to mount to the pod, what should our behavior be? I guess we should error out because, likely, if a user put in the wrong container name, and we just warned and created the pod, then they'd find out later, and fix the spec, causing the pod to regenerate. What do you think? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. What would be the point of the user adding their PVC to Yeah I think doing something (error/warning event/log) makes sense if the user specifies a container that doesn't exist. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yeah, the only potential that I see -- though there might be others -- is that the user has a container definition that already has that volume mounted and it's easier for them (for some reason, potentially CI related) to use that as a custom sidecar (with the volume mounted) rather than define the postgrescluster spec with that volume mounted to that container. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @andrewlecuyer This question isn't a blocker (as we can refine the solution as we move forwards) but I want to raise it: If the user supplies a container that doesn't exist, what should our behavior be? Options:
|
||||||||
} | ||||||||
} |
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍🏻 I like that this takes a template.