Skip to content

Remove unused remoteAgentServices from RAR - #55881

Merged
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
pgimalac/rar-cleanup
Sep 4, 2026
Merged

Remove unused remoteAgentServices from RAR#55881
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
pgimalac/rar-cleanup

Conversation

@pgimalac

@pgimalac pgimalac commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What does this PR do?

Remove unused remoteAgentServices from RAR

Motivation

Code cleanup.

Describe how you validated your changes

CI

Additional Notes

Noticed during a PR review.

@pgimalac pgimalac added the changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed label Sep 4, 2026
@pgimalac
pgimalac requested a review from a team as a code owner September 4, 2026 12:15
@pgimalac pgimalac added the qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests label Sep 4, 2026
@pgimalac
pgimalac requested a review from fabbing September 4, 2026 12:15
@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts Bot added internal Identify a non-fork PR team/agent-runtimes labels Sep 4, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly label Sep 4, 2026

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AI review by Codex (OpenAI) - workflow run

Patch is correct. The removed field and initialization were unused; service filtering continues to use each remote agent client’s advertised services.

@datadog-datadog-prod-us1

datadog-datadog-prod-us1 Bot commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
Patch Coverage: 100.00%
Overall Coverage: 57.00% (+1.72%)

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: c09b2fa | Docs | View more details | Give us feedback!

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Files inventory check summary

File checks results against ancestor 14a1e606:

Results for datadog-agent_7.85.0~devel.git.11.c09b2fa.pipeline.135459416-1_amd64.deb:

No change detected

Results for datadog-iot-agent_7.85.0~devel.git.11.c09b2fa.pipeline.135459416-1_amd64.deb:

No change detected

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Static quality checks

✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates
Comparison made with ancestor 14a1e60
📊 Static Quality Gates Dashboard
🔗 SQG Job

Successful checks

Info

Quality gate Change Size (prev → curr → max)
agent_deb_amd64_fips -4.0 KiB (0.00% reduction, +0.13% of buffer) 715.052 → 715.048 → 718.020
agent_rpm_amd64_fips -4.0 KiB (0.00% reduction, +0.13% of buffer) 715.036 → 715.032 → 718.020
agent_suse_amd64_fips -4.0 KiB (0.00% reduction, +0.13% of buffer) 715.036 → 715.032 → 718.020
iot_agent_deb_armhf -4.0 KiB (0.01% reduction, +0.42% of buffer) 44.097 → 44.094 → 45.020
28 successful checks with minimal change (< 2 KiB)
Quality gate Current Size
agent_deb_amd64 768.464 MiB
agent_heroku_amd64 316.124 MiB
agent_rpm_amd64 768.448 MiB
agent_rpm_arm64 740.392 MiB
agent_rpm_arm64_fips 691.525 MiB
agent_suse_amd64 768.448 MiB
agent_suse_arm64 740.392 MiB
agent_suse_arm64_fips 691.525 MiB
docker_agent_amd64 827.427 MiB
docker_agent_arm64 824.427 MiB
docker_agent_jmx_amd64 1018.340 MiB
docker_agent_jmx_arm64 1004.120 MiB
docker_cluster_agent_amd64 212.687 MiB
docker_cluster_agent_arm64 225.718 MiB
docker_cws_instrumentation_amd64 7.439 MiB
docker_cws_instrumentation_arm64 6.877 MiB
docker_dogstatsd_amd64 39.557 MiB
docker_dogstatsd_arm64 37.686 MiB
docker_host_profiler_amd64 307.574 MiB
docker_host_profiler_arm64 318.791 MiB
dogstatsd_deb_amd64 30.303 MiB
dogstatsd_deb_arm64 28.315 MiB
dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 30.303 MiB
dogstatsd_suse_amd64 30.303 MiB
iot_agent_deb_amd64 46.651 MiB
iot_agent_deb_arm64 43.280 MiB
iot_agent_rpm_amd64 46.651 MiB
iot_agent_suse_amd64 46.650 MiB

@cit-pr-commenter-54b7da

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Job ID: 012702a5-d326-41df-9232-bada3a2c139d

Baseline: cc46627
Comparison: e536526
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization +2.74 [+1.86, +3.62] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory utilization +0.48 [+0.25, +0.72] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization +0.12 [+0.08, +0.15] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load memory utilization -0.16 [-0.24, -0.09] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory utilization -0.16 [-0.21, -0.12] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_private_action_runner memory utilization -0.25 [-0.38, -0.13] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
dsd_uds_10mb_3k_timestamped_contexts_memory memory utilization -0.30 [-0.52, -0.08] 1 Logs
quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load memory utilization -0.31 [-0.35, -0.27] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_idle memory utilization -0.64 [-0.67, -0.60] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
dsd_uds_10mb_3k_timestamped_contexts_cpu % cpu utilization -0.74 [-0.98, -0.50] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed observed_value links
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 4 ≤ 5 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 173.96MiB ≤ 179MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle total_bytes_received 10/10 745.54KiB ≤ 819.20KiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 4 ≤ 5 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 529.77MiB ≤ 537MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features total_bytes_received 10/10 1.13MiB ≤ 1.25MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10 18 ≤ 40 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10 212.23MiB ≤ 228MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs total_bytes_received 10/10 263.48MiB ≤ 292MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs cpu_usage 10/10 369.32 ≤ 2000 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs intake_connections 10/10 19 ≤ 40 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory_usage 10/10 445.63MiB ≤ 455MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs total_bytes_received 10/10 0.94GiB ≤ 1.04GiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_private_action_runner memory_usage 10/10 71.61MiB ≤ 75MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_idle cpu_usage 10/10 30.02 ≤ 100 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_idle memory_usage 10/10 328.63MiB ≤ 355MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load cpu_usage 10/10 76.78 ≤ 200 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load memory_usage 10/10 301.64MiB ≤ 335MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load cpu_usage 10/10 24.26 ≤ 100 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load memory_usage 10/10 308.42MiB ≤ 345MiB bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_security_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_idle, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_no_fs_load, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_no_fs_load, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_private_action_runner, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot merged commit e536526 into main Sep 4, 2026
286 of 294 checks passed
@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot deleted the pgimalac/rar-cleanup branch September 4, 2026 16:24
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the 7.85.0 milestone Sep 4, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed internal Identify a non-fork PR qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly team/agent-runtimes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants