Skip to content

Conversation

@gleocadie
Copy link
Contributor

@gleocadie gleocadie commented Nov 5, 2025

Motivation

.NET tracer supports only config v1 protocol but the libdatadog library-config emits v2. This misalignment causes the system-tests to fails in CI.

Changes

Decorate the test test_metadata_content_with_process_tags as bug. The goal being to detect when .NET library support v2 protocol and the test needs to be updated accordingly.

Workflow

  1. ⚠️ Create your PR as draft ⚠️
  2. Work on you PR until the CI passes
  3. Mark it as ready for review
    • Test logic is modified? -> Get a review from RFC owner.
    • Framework is modified, or non obvious usage of it -> get a review from R&P team

🚀 Once your PR is reviewed and the CI green, you can merge it!

🛟 #apm-shared-testing 🛟

Reviewer checklist

  • If PR title starts with [<language>], double-check that only <language> is impacted by the change
  • No system-tests internal is modified. Otherwise, I have the approval from R&P team
  • A docker base image is modified?
    • the relevant build-XXX-image label is present
  • A scenario is added (or removed)?

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 5, 2025

CODEOWNERS have been resolved as:

tests/parametric/test_process_discovery.py                              @DataDog/system-tests-core @DataDog/apm-sdk-capabilities

@gleocadie gleocadie force-pushed the gleocadie/disable-test-discovery-test-for-dotnet branch 2 times, most recently from 24775ea to ef8e764 Compare November 5, 2025 10:32
@gleocadie gleocadie force-pushed the gleocadie/disable-test-discovery-test-for-dotnet branch from f28a35a to f8f4deb Compare November 5, 2025 11:34
@gleocadie gleocadie changed the title [dotnet] Mark test test_metadata_content_with_process_tags as a bug for now [dotnet] Mark test test_metadata_content_with_process_tags as a missing feature for now Nov 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants