feat: add Trae IDE support to configuration #229
Conversation
- Implement TraeConfigurator class for Trae IDE integration - Add Trae to AI_TOOLS configuration in config.ts - Register TraeConfigurator in ToolRegistry - Add comprehensive unit tests for TraeConfigurator - Create change proposal documentation for add-trae-support - Support .trae/rules/project_rules.md configuration file - Enable Trae IDE option in CLI init command
Fission ai main 20251022
WalkthroughAdds Trae IDE configurator and registration, CLI init support to inject OpenSpec directives into Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant CLI as OpenSpec CLI
participant Reg as ToolRegistry
participant Trae as TraeConfigurator
participant Tpl as TemplateManager
participant FS as FileSystemUtils
U->>CLI: run `openspec init`
CLI->>Reg: request configurators
Reg-->>CLI: includes TraeConfigurator
U->>CLI: chooses "Trae IDE"
CLI->>Trae: configure(projectPath, openspecDir)
Trae->>Tpl: getAgentsStandardTemplate()
Tpl-->>Trae: templateContent
Trae->>FS: updateFileWithMarkers(.trae/rules/project_rules.md, templateContent)
FS-->>Trae: file created/updated (markers inserted/replaced)
Trae-->>CLI: configure complete
CLI-->>U: success
sequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant CLI as OpenSpec CLI
participant Val as ValidateCommand
participant Out as OutputFormatter
U->>CLI: run `openspec validate [--json]`
CLI->>Val: perform validation
Val-->>Out: validationResults
alt --json flag present
Out->>U: emit structured JSON { valid, errors[], changeId }
else no flag
Out->>U: emit human-readable text
end
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~45 minutes Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
openspec/changes/add-trae-support/proposal.md(1 hunks)openspec/changes/add-trae-support/specs/cli-init/spec.md(1 hunks)openspec/changes/add-trae-support/tasks.md(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)src/core/config.ts(1 hunks)src/core/configurators/registry.ts(2 hunks)src/core/configurators/trae.ts(1 hunks)test/core/configurators/trae.test.ts(1 hunks)test/core/init.test.ts(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (5)
openspec/changes/*/{proposal.md,tasks.md,design.md,specs/**/spec.md}
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (openspec/AGENTS.md)
Scaffold each change with proposal.md, tasks.md, optional design.md, and delta spec files under openspec/changes//specs//spec.md
Files:
openspec/changes/add-trae-support/specs/cli-init/spec.mdopenspec/changes/add-trae-support/tasks.mdopenspec/changes/add-trae-support/proposal.md
openspec/changes/*/**
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (openspec/AGENTS.md)
Choose a unique kebab-case, verb-led change-id (add-, update-, remove-, refactor-) for openspec/changes//
Files:
openspec/changes/add-trae-support/specs/cli-init/spec.mdopenspec/changes/add-trae-support/tasks.mdopenspec/changes/add-trae-support/proposal.md
openspec/{specs/**/spec.md,changes/*/specs/**/spec.md}
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (openspec/AGENTS.md)
openspec/{specs/**/spec.md,changes/*/specs/**/spec.md}: Write requirements using SHALL/MUST for normative wording
Every requirement must include at least one scenario, formatted exactly with a '#### Scenario: ' header (no bullets or bold)
Under ADDED, introduce new capabilities as standalone requirements rather than altering existing ones
Files:
openspec/changes/add-trae-support/specs/cli-init/spec.md
openspec/changes/*/specs/**/spec.md
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (openspec/AGENTS.md)
openspec/changes/*/specs/**/spec.md: Use ADDED, MODIFIED, REMOVED, or RENAMED sections when authoring deltas; place changed requirements under the correct operation header
For MODIFIED requirements, paste the full existing requirement block (header through scenarios) and ensure the header text matches exactly (whitespace-insensitive)
Use RENAMED when only the requirement name changes; if behavior changes too, use RENAMED plus MODIFIED referencing the new name
Files:
openspec/changes/add-trae-support/specs/cli-init/spec.md
openspec/changes/*/tasks.md
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (openspec/AGENTS.md)
Track implementation steps in tasks.md and mark each completed item with '- [x]' once finished
Files:
openspec/changes/add-trae-support/tasks.md
🧬 Code graph analysis (3)
src/core/configurators/trae.ts (4)
src/core/configurators/base.ts (1)
ToolConfigurator(1-6)src/core/templates/index.ts (1)
TemplateManager(13-42)src/utils/file-system.ts (1)
FileSystemUtils(44-187)src/core/config.ts (1)
OPENSPEC_MARKERS(3-6)
src/core/configurators/registry.ts (2)
src/core/configurators/trae.ts (1)
TraeConfigurator(11-27)src/core/configurators/agents.ts (1)
AgentsStandardConfigurator(7-23)
test/core/configurators/trae.test.ts (4)
src/core/configurators/trae.ts (1)
TraeConfigurator(11-27)src/utils/file-system.ts (1)
FileSystemUtils(44-187)src/core/config.ts (1)
OPENSPEC_MARKERS(3-6)src/core/templates/index.ts (1)
TemplateManager(13-42)
🔇 Additional comments (15)
package.json (1)
72-73: LGTM! Package manager declaration added.The
packageManagerfield explicitly declares pnpm with an integrity hash, which helps ensure reproducible builds across environments.src/core/config.ts (1)
29-29: LGTM! Trae IDE added to AI tools configuration.The entry follows the same pattern as other tools and correctly references the 'trae' tool ID that's registered in the ToolRegistry.
src/core/configurators/registry.ts (2)
5-5: LGTM! TraeConfigurator imported correctly.
15-21: LGTM! TraeConfigurator registered following the established pattern.The configurator is instantiated and registered with the 'trae' key, which matches the tool value in the AI_TOOLS configuration.
test/core/init.test.ts (1)
868-878: LGTM! Extend mode test for Trae follows the established pattern.The test correctly verifies that Trae is marked as configured during the second initialization run, consistent with how other tools are tested.
openspec/changes/add-trae-support/specs/cli-init/spec.md (1)
1-24: Spec scenarios align with implementation.The three scenarios correctly describe the behavior implemented by TraeConfigurator:
- Injecting OpenSpec directives into
.trae/rules/project_rules.md- Updating existing files while preserving content outside markers
- Creating directory structure when it doesn't exist (handled by
FileSystemUtils.updateFileWithMarkers)The spec follows OpenSpec format with proper ADDED section, SHALL requirements, and scenario structure.
src/core/configurators/trae.ts (2)
1-6: LGTM! Imports are correct and complete.
11-27: LGTM! TraeConfigurator implementation is correct and consistent.The implementation correctly:
- Implements the
ToolConfiguratorinterface- Targets
.trae/rules/project_rules.mdas specified- Reuses the agents standard template via
TemplateManager.getAgentsStandardTemplate()- Leverages
FileSystemUtils.updateFileWithMarkers()to handle file creation, directory setup, and marker-based updatesThis pattern matches other configurators like
AgentsStandardConfiguratorand correctly handles all three scenarios defined in the spec.test/core/configurators/trae.test.ts (4)
23-27: LGTM! Properties test correctly verifies configurator metadata.
29-43: LGTM! File creation test verifies proper initialization.The test correctly verifies that the configurator creates the configuration file with proper markers and OpenSpec content.
45-71: LGTM! Update test verifies non-destructive content injection.The test correctly verifies that existing custom content is preserved while the OpenSpec section between markers is updated.
73-84: LGTM! Template test verifies correct content source.openspec/changes/add-trae-support/proposal.md (3)
1-21: Consider aligning documentation language with project standards.The proposal is well-structured and clearly articulates the motivation, scope, and impact of adding Trae IDE support. However, the entire document is written in Chinese while most projects default to English for their public documentation and specifications.
Verify with the team whether Chinese is acceptable for proposal documentation or if this should be translated/rewritten in English to align with project standards.
7-12: Proposal clearly outlines the implementation scope.The "What Changes" section appropriately details the new TraeConfigurator class, registry integration, and marker-based content injection following the existing configurator pattern. This aligns well with the pattern established by other tool configurators in the codebase.
14-21: Impact section confirms backward compatibility and proper scaffolding references.The proposal correctly notes backward compatibility and references the affected specs (
cli-init) and implementation files. Per the coding guidelines, ensure that the full scaffolding is in place: proposal.md ✓, and verify that accompanyingtasks.md, optionaldesign.md, and delta spec files underopenspec/changes/add-trae-support/specs/*/spec.mdare all present.
| # 实现任务 | ||
|
|
||
| ## 1. 核心实现 | ||
| - [ ] 1.1 创建 `src/core/configurators/trae.ts` 文件 | ||
| - [ ] 1.2 实现 `TraeConfigurator` 类，继承 `ToolConfigurator` 接口 | ||
| - [ ] 1.3 配置目标文件路径为 `.trae/rules/project_rules.md` | ||
| - [ ] 1.4 使用 `TemplateManager.getAgentsStandardTemplate()` 获取模板内容 | ||
|
|
||
| ## 2. 注册集成 | ||
| - [ ] 2.1 在 `src/core/configurators/registry.ts` 中导入 `TraeConfigurator` | ||
| - [ ] 2.2 在 `ToolRegistry` 静态块中注册 Trae 配置器 | ||
| - [ ] 2.3 使用 'trae' 作为工具 ID | ||
|
|
||
| ## 3. 测试验证 | ||
| - [ ] 3.1 创建单元测试文件 `test/core/configurators/trae.test.ts` | ||
| - [ ] 3.2 测试配置器的基本功能 | ||
| - [ ] 3.3 验证文件路径和内容生成 | ||
| - [ ] 3.4 运行现有测试确保无回归 | ||
|
|
||
| ## 4. 文档更新 | ||
| - [ ] 4.1 确认 CLI 初始化命令自动包含新的配置器 | ||
| - [ ] 4.2 验证 `openspec init` 命令中 Trae 选项可用 No newline at end of file |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Mark completed tasks as done.
All tasks listed in this file have been implemented:
- Core implementation:
TraeConfiguratorclass created insrc/core/configurators/trae.ts✓ - Registration: Configurator registered in
src/core/configurators/registry.tswith 'trae' ID ✓ - Testing: Unit tests in
test/core/configurators/trae.test.tsand integration test intest/core/init.test.ts✓ - Documentation: Trae option available in
src/core/config.tsand spec documented ✓
As per coding guidelines, mark each completed item with - [x] once finished.
Apply this diff to mark all tasks as complete:
# 实现任务
## 1. 核心实现
-- [ ] 1.1 创建 `src/core/configurators/trae.ts` 文件
-- [ ] 1.2 实现 `TraeConfigurator` 类，继承 `ToolConfigurator` 接口
-- [ ] 1.3 配置目标文件路径为 `.trae/rules/project_rules.md`
-- [ ] 1.4 使用 `TemplateManager.getAgentsStandardTemplate()` 获取模板内容
+- [x] 1.1 创建 `src/core/configurators/trae.ts` 文件
+- [x] 1.2 实现 `TraeConfigurator` 类，继承 `ToolConfigurator` 接口
+- [x] 1.3 配置目标文件路径为 `.trae/rules/project_rules.md`
+- [x] 1.4 使用 `TemplateManager.getAgentsStandardTemplate()` 获取模板内容
## 2. 注册集成
-- [ ] 2.1 在 `src/core/configurators/registry.ts` 中导入 `TraeConfigurator`
-- [ ] 2.2 在 `ToolRegistry` 静态块中注册 Trae 配置器
-- [ ] 2.3 使用 'trae' 作为工具 ID
+- [x] 2.1 在 `src/core/configurators/registry.ts` 中导入 `TraeConfigurator`
+- [x] 2.2 在 `ToolRegistry` 静态块中注册 Trae 配置器
+- [x] 2.3 使用 'trae' 作为工具 ID
## 3. 测试验证
-- [ ] 3.1 创建单元测试文件 `test/core/configurators/trae.test.ts`
-- [ ] 3.2 测试配置器的基本功能
-- [ ] 3.3 验证文件路径和内容生成
-- [ ] 3.4 运行现有测试确保无回归
+- [x] 3.1 创建单元测试文件 `test/core/configurators/trae.test.ts`
+- [x] 3.2 测试配置器的基本功能
+- [x] 3.3 验证文件路径和内容生成
+- [x] 3.4 运行现有测试确保无回归
## 4. 文档更新
-- [ ] 4.1 确认 CLI 初始化命令自动包含新的配置器
-- [ ] 4.2 验证 `openspec init` 命令中 Trae 选项可用
+- [x] 4.1 确认 CLI 初始化命令自动包含新的配置器
+- [x] 4.2 验证 `openspec init` 命令中 Trae 选项可用🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In openspec/changes/add-trae-support/tasks.md around lines 1 to 22, the review
says all checklist items are implemented but the file still shows unchecked
boxes; update each task checkbox to checked by replacing every "- [ ]" with "-
[x]" for items 1.1–4.2 so the file accurately reflects completion.
TabishB
left a comment
TabishB
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey sorry, spoke too soon, this is failing the CI tests, needs to pass the linting and the tests
| "packageManager": "[email protected]+sha512.cce0f9de9c5a7c95bef944169cc5dfe8741abfb145078c0d508b868056848a87c81e626246cb60967cbd7fd29a6c062ef73ff840d96b3c86c40ac92cf4a813ee" | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@forztf I dobnt think this should be commited, it's causing the tests to fail:
Error: Multiple versions of pnpm specified:
- version 9 in the GitHub Action config with the key "version"
- version [email protected]+sha512.cce0f9de9c5a7c95bef944169cc5dfe8741abfb145078c0d508b868056848a87c81e626246cb60967cbd7fd29a6c062ef73ff840d96b3c86c40ac92cf4a813ee in the package.json with the key "packageManager"
Remove one of these versions to avoid version mismatch errors like ERR_PNPM_BAD_PM_VERSION
at readTarget (/home/runner/work/_actions/pnpm/action-setup/v4/dist/index.js:1:4977)
at runSelfInstaller (/home/runner/work/_actions/pnpm/action-setup/v4/dist/index.js:1:4142)
at async install (/home/runner/work/_actions/pnpm/action-setup/v4/dist/index.js:1:3154)
at async main (/home/runner/work/_actions/pnpm/action-setup/v4/dist/index.js:1:445)
- 添加中文版本的模板文件 (zh-cn目录) - 实现基于系统语言的条件模板导入 - 在测试环境下强制使用英文模板以确保测试兼容性 - 修复claude和cline模板的条件导入功能 - 更新相关的导入和导出逻辑
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/core/templates/index.ts (1)
1-8: Refactor the long language detection expression for readability.Line 6 is over 200 characters long and chains multiple environment variable checks with fallback to Intl API. This makes it difficult to read, maintain, and debug.
Apply this diff to improve readability:
const isZhOS = (() => { // 在测试环境下强制使用英文模板 if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'test' || process.env.VITEST === 'true') { return false; } - const lang = (process.env.LANG || process.env.LANGUAGE || process.env.LC_ALL || process.env.LC_MESSAGES || Intl.DateTimeFormat().resolvedOptions().locale || '').toLowerCase(); + const lang = ( + process.env.LANG || + process.env.LANGUAGE || + process.env.LC_ALL || + process.env.LC_MESSAGES || + Intl.DateTimeFormat().resolvedOptions().locale || + '' + ).toLowerCase(); return lang.startsWith('zh'); })();openspec/changes/add-validation-json-output/tasks.md (1)
1-13: Task completion status appears inconsistent with implementation.All 8 tasks are marked incomplete (
- [ ]), but the relevant code snippets show substantial implementation already present insrc/commands/validate.ts(lines 29–272) with JSON output logic, and multiple tests intest/commands/validate.test.tsandtest/commands/spec.test.ts(lines 82–273).Per coding guidelines, completed items should be marked
- [x]. Verify task status and update checkboxes accordingly.Once verified, update task items to reflect completion:
- Tasks 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 (CLI implementation) should likely be
- [x]if the validate.ts implementation is final- Tasks 3.1, 3.2 (unit and integration tests) should likely be
- [x]if tests are passing- Remaining items should remain
- [ ]only if actually pendingExample update (if those tasks are done):
- [ ] 1.1 Add `--json` flag to the validate command in `src/cli/index.ts` - [ ] 1.2 Modify validation logic in `src/commands/validate.ts` to support JSON output format - [ ] 1.3 Implement JSON output structure with detailed error information + [x] 1.1 Add `--json` flag to the validate command in `src/cli/index.ts` + [x] 1.2 Modify validation logic in `src/commands/validate.ts` to support JSON output format + [x] 1.3 Implement JSON output structure with detailed error information
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
.gitignore(1 hunks)openspec/changes/add-validation-json-output/proposal.md(1 hunks)openspec/changes/add-validation-json-output/specs/cli-validate/spec.md(1 hunks)openspec/changes/add-validation-json-output/tasks.md(1 hunks)src/core/templates/index.ts(2 hunks)src/core/templates/zh-cn/agents-root-stub.ts(1 hunks)src/core/templates/zh-cn/agents-template.ts(1 hunks)src/core/templates/zh-cn/claude-template.ts(1 hunks)src/core/templates/zh-cn/cline-template.ts(1 hunks)src/core/templates/zh-cn/project-template.ts(1 hunks)src/core/templates/zh-cn/slash-command-templates.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (5)
openspec/changes/*/{proposal.md,tasks.md,design.md,specs/**/spec.md}
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (openspec/AGENTS.md)
Scaffold each change with proposal.md, tasks.md, optional design.md, and delta spec files under openspec/changes//specs//spec.md
Files:
openspec/changes/add-validation-json-output/tasks.mdopenspec/changes/add-validation-json-output/specs/cli-validate/spec.mdopenspec/changes/add-validation-json-output/proposal.md
openspec/changes/*/**
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (openspec/AGENTS.md)
Choose a unique kebab-case, verb-led change-id (add-, update-, remove-, refactor-) for openspec/changes//
Files:
openspec/changes/add-validation-json-output/tasks.mdopenspec/changes/add-validation-json-output/specs/cli-validate/spec.mdopenspec/changes/add-validation-json-output/proposal.md
openspec/changes/*/tasks.md
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (openspec/AGENTS.md)
Track implementation steps in tasks.md and mark each completed item with '- [x]' once finished
Files:
openspec/changes/add-validation-json-output/tasks.md
openspec/{specs/**/spec.md,changes/*/specs/**/spec.md}
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (openspec/AGENTS.md)
openspec/{specs/**/spec.md,changes/*/specs/**/spec.md}: Write requirements using SHALL/MUST for normative wording
Every requirement must include at least one scenario, formatted exactly with a '#### Scenario: ' header (no bullets or bold)
Under ADDED, introduce new capabilities as standalone requirements rather than altering existing ones
Files:
openspec/changes/add-validation-json-output/specs/cli-validate/spec.md
openspec/changes/*/specs/**/spec.md
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (openspec/AGENTS.md)
openspec/changes/*/specs/**/spec.md: Use ADDED, MODIFIED, REMOVED, or RENAMED sections when authoring deltas; place changed requirements under the correct operation header
For MODIFIED requirements, paste the full existing requirement block (header through scenarios) and ensure the header text matches exactly (whitespace-insensitive)
Use RENAMED when only the requirement name changes; if behavior changes too, use RENAMED plus MODIFIED referencing the new name
Files:
openspec/changes/add-validation-json-output/specs/cli-validate/spec.md
🧠 Learnings (2)
📚 Learning: 2025-10-21T03:05:07.846Z
Learnt from: CR
PR: Fission-AI/OpenSpec#0
File: AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-10-21T03:05:07.846Z
Learning: Use @/openspec/AGENTS.md to learn spec format and conventions
Applied to files:
src/core/templates/zh-cn/agents-root-stub.ts
📚 Learning: 2025-10-21T03:05:07.846Z
Learnt from: CR
PR: Fission-AI/OpenSpec#0
File: AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-10-21T03:05:07.846Z
Learning: Use @/openspec/AGENTS.md to learn the project structure and guidelines
Applied to files:
src/core/templates/zh-cn/agents-root-stub.ts
🧬 Code graph analysis (11)
openspec/changes/add-validation-json-output/tasks.md (6)
src/commands/validate.ts (3)
ValidateCommand(30-273)printReport(149-166)ExecuteOptions(11-20)test/commands/validate.test.ts (1)
changeId(98-132)src/commands/change.ts (1)
ChangeCommand(16-291)test/commands/validate.enriched-output.test.ts (1)
changeContent(21-46)test/core/commands/change-command.show-validate.test.ts (2)
cmd(7-111)logs(92-110)test/cli-e2e/basic.test.ts (1)
projectDir(63-72)
openspec/changes/add-validation-json-output/specs/cli-validate/spec.md (2)
src/commands/validate.ts (3)
ValidateCommand(30-273)ExecuteOptions(11-20)runBulkValidation(183-272)src/core/validation/validator.ts (2)
validateChangeDeltaSpecs(113-272)Validator(15-448)
src/core/templates/zh-cn/claude-template.ts (2)
test/core/update.test.ts (2)
claudePath(38-74)claudePath(882-905)src/core/configurators/claude.ts (2)
ClaudeConfigurator(7-23)configure(12-22)
src/core/templates/zh-cn/agents-root-stub.ts (5)
src/core/templates/zh-cn/claude-template.ts (1)
agentsRootStubTemplateZh(1-1)src/core/templates/zh-cn/cline-template.ts (1)
agentsRootStubTemplateZh(1-1)test/core/update.test.ts (4)
rootAgentsPath(985-1008)proposalPath(76-115)updateCommand(971-983)proposalPath(179-216)src/core/configurators/agents.ts (2)
AgentsStandardConfigurator(7-23)configure(12-22)src/core/init.ts (1)
configureRootAgentsStub(721-736)
src/core/templates/index.ts (13)
src/core/templates/agents-template.ts (1)
agentsTemplate(1-455)src/core/templates/zh-cn/agents-template.ts (1)
agentsTemplateZh(1-457)src/core/templates/project-template.ts (2)
projectTemplate(8-38)ProjectContext(1-6)src/core/templates/zh-cn/project-template.ts (2)
projectTemplateZh(8-38)ProjectContext(1-6)src/core/templates/cline-template.ts (1)
agentsRootStubTemplate(1-1)src/core/templates/agents-root-stub.ts (1)
agentsRootStubTemplate(1-16)src/core/templates/claude-template.ts (1)
agentsRootStubTemplate(1-1)src/core/templates/zh-cn/agents-root-stub.ts (1)
agentsRootStubTemplateZh(1-18)src/core/templates/zh-cn/claude-template.ts (1)
agentsRootStubTemplateZh(1-1)src/core/templates/zh-cn/cline-template.ts (1)
agentsRootStubTemplateZh(1-1)src/core/templates/zh-cn/slash-command-templates.ts (2)
getSlashCommandBody(56-58)SlashCommandId(1-1)src/core/templates/slash-command-templates.ts (2)
getSlashCommandBody(56-58)SlashCommandId(1-1)src/core/configurators/slash/base.ts (1)
updateExisting(51-64)
src/core/templates/zh-cn/project-template.ts (2)
src/core/templates/index.ts (1)
ProjectContext(75-75)src/core/templates/project-template.ts (2)
ProjectContext(1-6)context(8-38)
src/core/templates/zh-cn/slash-command-templates.ts (4)
src/core/templates/index.ts (2)
SlashCommandId(76-76)getSlashCommandBody(70-72)src/core/configurators/slash/cline.ts (1)
ClineSlashCommandConfigurator(10-27)src/core/configurators/slash/base.ts (2)
updateExisting(51-64)getBody(69-71)src/core/configurators/slash/factory.ts (1)
FactorySlashCommandConfigurator(25-41)
src/core/templates/zh-cn/agents-template.ts (2)
test/core/update.test.ts (6)
rootAgentsPath(985-1008)codeBuddyPath(666-705)proposalPath(76-115)openCodePath(253-289)updateCommand(971-983)consoleSpy(868-880)src/core/configurators/agents.ts (2)
AgentsStandardConfigurator(7-23)configure(12-22)
src/core/templates/zh-cn/cline-template.ts (2)
src/core/configurators/cline.ts (2)
ClineConfigurator(7-23)configure(12-22)test/core/update.test.ts (2)
clinePath(129-165)clinePath(167-177)
openspec/changes/add-validation-json-output/proposal.md (5)
src/commands/validate.ts (4)
ValidateCommand(30-273)runBulkValidation(183-272)ExecuteOptions(11-20)printReport(149-166)test/commands/validate.test.ts (2)
result(83-90)changeId(98-132)src/commands/spec.ts (1)
specId(204-247)src/core/validation/validator.ts (2)
validateChangeDeltaSpecs(113-272)Validator(15-448)test/commands/spec.test.ts (1)
it(196-274)
.gitignore (2)
test/core/update.test.ts (8)
claudePath(38-74)proposalPath(907-937)proposalPath(76-115)claudePath(1023-1062)proposalPath(179-216)claudePath(882-905)codeBuddyPath(666-705)claudePath(117-127)test/cli-e2e/basic.test.ts (1)
projectDir(102-115)
🔇 Additional comments (14)
.gitignore (3)
154-155: LGTM: Trae and Qoder IDE support entries.The
.trae/and.qoder/ignore entries properly support the new IDE configurator functionality.
156-159: Clarify scope of translation checklist additions.Lines 156–159 add translation-related files (
chinese_translation_checklist.md,test-results.txt,translation_checklist_V2.md,translation_checklist.md) that appear orthogonal to the Trae IDE support feature. Confirm whether these belong in this PR or should be committed separately.
152-152: Verify.pnpm-store/removal.The AI summary indicates that
.pnpm-store/is being removed from the ignore list. Confirm this is intentional—pnpm's store directory is typically excluded from version control. If removal is unintended, restore the entry.src/core/templates/zh-cn/agents-template.ts (1)
1-457: LGTM! Comprehensive Chinese template for OpenSpec agents.The Chinese template provides thorough instructions covering the three-phase workflow, CLI commands, spec formats, and best practices. The structure aligns well with the English version, ensuring consistency across languages.
src/core/templates/zh-cn/cline-template.ts (1)
1-1: LGTM! Clean re-export for Cline template.The re-export pattern correctly aliases the Chinese agents root stub template for Cline IDE support.
src/core/templates/zh-cn/claude-template.ts (1)
1-1: LGTM! Clean re-export for Claude template.The re-export pattern correctly aliases the Chinese agents root stub template for Claude IDE support, maintaining consistency with the Cline template approach.
src/core/templates/zh-cn/agents-root-stub.ts (1)
1-18: LGTM! Well-structured Chinese stub template.The stub appropriately directs AI assistants to the full AGENTS.md documentation and includes a helpful note to always use Chinese when communicating with developers. The template preserves the marker structure for updates via
openspec update.src/core/templates/index.ts (2)
1-37: Consider the implications of runtime language switching.The language selection happens at module load time based on environment variables. Once loaded, the language cannot be changed without restarting the process. Ensure this aligns with your intended behavior, especially in long-running processes or scenarios where language preferences might change.
10-76: No issues found; interfaces are synchronized.Verification confirms that
ProjectContextandSlashCommandIdinterfaces remain identical across both English and Chinese template variants. The union types inindex.tsare structurally valid and pose no type safety risks at call sites.src/core/templates/zh-cn/slash-command-templates.ts (1)
1-58: LGTM! Well-organized Chinese slash command templates.The module provides comprehensive Chinese translations for all three slash commands (proposal, apply, archive) with proper guardrails, steps, and references. The structure mirrors the English version, ensuring consistency.
src/core/templates/zh-cn/project-template.ts (1)
1-38: LGTM! Clean Chinese project template implementation.The module provides a Chinese-localized project template with the same structure and interface as the English version. The template includes appropriate default values and placeholder text, ensuring a good user experience for Chinese-speaking developers.
openspec/changes/add-validation-json-output/proposal.md (1)
1-11: Proposal structure is appropriate.The proposal follows the scaffold pattern with clear rationale, scope, and impact sections. The change-id
add-validation-json-outputcorrectly uses verb-led kebab-case naming.openspec/changes/add-validation-json-output/specs/cli-validate/spec.md (2)
2-9: First requirement is well-formed.Proper SHALL language and scenario structure with WHEN-THEN-AND flow. ✓
20-26: Backward compatibility requirement is well-formed.Proper SHALL language and scenario structure. The requirement appropriately guards against breaking existing callers. ✓
| test-results.txt | ||
| translation_checklist_V2.md | ||
| translation_checklist.md | ||
| .trae/rules/project_rules.md |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove redundant ignore entry.
Line 160 (.trae/rules/project_rules.md) is already covered by line 154 (.trae/), which ignores all files under the .trae/ directory. The specific file entry is unnecessary.
-.trae/rules/project_rules.md📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| .trae/rules/project_rules.md |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .gitignore around line 160, remove the redundant entry
".trae/rules/project_rules.md" because the directory ignore ".trae/" on line 154
already covers it; simply delete line 160 (or collapse duplicate entries) and
commit the updated .gitignore.
| ### Requirement: JSON Output Format | ||
| The JSON output SHALL include structured information about validation results including change identifiers, validation status, error details, and file locations. | ||
|
|
||
| #### Scenario: JSON output structure | ||
| - **WHEN** validation is run with the `--json` flag | ||
| - **THEN** the output SHALL be a valid JSON object | ||
| - **AND** include fields for `valid`, `errors`, and `changeId` | ||
| - **AND** each error SHALL include `message`, `file`, and `line` information when applicable |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
JSON schema mismatch between spec and implementation.
The spec requires JSON output with fields { valid, errors, changeId } and error objects with { message, file, line }. However, the implementation (validate.ts lines 150–152, 260–262) emits { items: [...], summary: {...}, version: '1.0' } with issues containing { level, path, message }.
Reconcile the spec to match the actual implementation, or update the implementation to match the spec.
Please verify which schema is canonical by checking:
- Existing test expectations (test/commands/validate.test.ts lines 82–89)
- Whether the implementation is intentional and the spec needs updating, or vice versa
If the implementation is correct, update the spec to reflect the actual items, summary, version structure and the level/path error fields.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Find and read the spec file
find . -name "spec.md" -path "*/add-validation-json-output/specs/cli-validate/*" 2>/dev/null | head -5Length of output: 72
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Find validate.ts and validator.ts files
find . -name "validate.ts" -o -name "validator.ts" 2>/dev/null | grep -v node_modules | head -10Length of output: 61
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Find test file for validate command
find . -path "*/test/commands/validate.test.ts" 2>/dev/nullLength of output: 32
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Show directory structure to understand repository layout
ls -laLength of output: 1877
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for spec.md files anywhere under openspec/changes
find openspec/changes -name "spec.md" 2>/dev/nullLength of output: 5239
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for src or lib directories with validate-related files
find . -type d -name "src" -o -type d -name "lib" 2>/dev/null | head -5Length of output: 5
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# List all TypeScript files that contain "validate" in their name
find . -name "*validate*.ts" -type f 2>/dev/null | grep -v node_modules | head -20Length of output: 268
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# List test files
find . -path "*/test/*" -name "*.test.ts" 2>/dev/null | head -10Length of output: 392
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Show the current directory contents
pwd
find . -maxdepth 2 -type d | head -20Length of output: 251
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for spec files more broadly
find . -name "*.md" -type f 2>/dev/null | grep -i spec | head -20Length of output: 1267
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for "JSON Output Format" in codebase
rg -l "JSON Output Format" --type mdLength of output: 70
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for printReport function mentioned in review
rg -n "printReport" --type tsLength of output: 356
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for JSON output structure with items and summary
rg -n "items.*summary" --type ts | head -10Length of output: 426
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for test files related to validate command
rg -l "validate.*test\|test.*validate" --type ts | head -10Length of output: 0
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Find all markdown files in openspec
find openspec -name "*.md" 2>/dev/null | head -20Length of output: 1270
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Show structure of openspec directory
find openspec -type f | head -30Length of output: 2033
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the spec file at the exact location mentioned
cat "openspec/changes/add-validation-json-output/specs/cli-validate/spec.md" 2>/dev/null || echo "File not found at specified path"Length of output: 1435
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any files with "add-validation" in path
find . -path "*add-validation*" 2>/dev/nullLength of output: 348
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Read validate.ts to see implementation of printReport
cat src/commands/validate.ts | head -300 | tail -200Length of output: 8594
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Get specific lines from validate.ts around printReport
sed -n '140,170p' src/commands/validate.tsLength of output: 1524
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Get lines 250-270 to see the multi-report output
sed -n '250,270p' src/commands/validate.tsLength of output: 770
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Read validator.ts to check issue structure
cat src/core/validation/validator.ts | head -200Length of output: 8180
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for the issue/ValidationIssue type definition
rg -n "interface.*Issue\|type.*Issue" --type ts -A 5Length of output: 0
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the full printReport method
sed -n '149,165p' src/commands/validate.tsLength of output: 1079
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check test file expectations around lines 82-89
sed -n '75,95p' test/commands/validate.test.tsLength of output: 922
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for JSON output tests
rg -n "\.json\|JSON" test/commands/validate.test.ts | head -20Length of output: 0
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check what tests expect from validate command
cat test/commands/validate.test.ts | head -150Length of output: 5873
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for test assertions about JSON structure
rg -n "items\|summary\|version" test/commands/validate.test.tsLength of output: 0
Update spec to match the actual JSON output structure.
The implementation produces a different schema than the spec requires. Tests validate against the implementation, confirming it as canonical.
Spec requires: { valid, errors, changeId } with error fields { message, file, line }
Implementation outputs: { items: [...], summary: {...}, version: '1.0' } where each item has { id, type, valid, issues, durationMs } and each issue has { level, path, message }.
Update lines 11–18 to document the actual structure: top-level items array containing result objects with id, type, valid, and issues; include summary and version fields; specify issue fields as level, path, and message.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In openspec/changes/add-validation-json-output/specs/cli-validate/spec.md around
lines 11 to 18, the spec's JSON schema is out of date; replace the required
top-level fields `{ valid, errors, changeId }` and error shape `{ message, file,
line }` with the actual implementation schema: document a top-level "items"
array of result objects (each with id, type, valid, issues, durationMs), a
top-level "summary" object and a "version" field, and describe each issue object
as having "level", "path", and "message"; keep the WHEN/THEN scenario language
but update the expected fields to match the implementation.
|
Hey @forztf the tests are still failing in this PR. Let me know if I can be of some help here. |
2 participants
feat: add Trae IDE support to configuration
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Tests