Skip to content

Conversation

zsol
Copy link
Contributor

@zsol zsol commented Dec 7, 2024

Add a codemod for dataclass changes in 3.11

Python 3.11 changed the field default mutability check for dataclasses to only allow defaults which are hashable.

This codemod helps with the migration by changing all default values that aren't obviously hashable to use default_factory instead.

Note: it's impossible to accurately determine if a particular expression produces a hashable value in a codemod, so the codemod significantly over-approximates what's unhashable.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Dec 7, 2024
@zsol zsol marked this pull request as ready for review December 7, 2024 15:19
Copy link
Contributor

@itamaro itamaro left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it too cumbersome to identify zero-args-calls used as mutable defaults and drop the lambda in those cases?
Similarly for empty list/dict literals, using list / dict instead of the lambda

@zsol
Copy link
Contributor Author

zsol commented Dec 7, 2024

@itamaro no, not at all. If you wanna take a stab at it, feel free to commandeer this PR :)

@itamaro
Copy link
Contributor

itamaro commented Dec 7, 2024

If you wanna take a stab at it, feel free to commandeer this PR :)

don't have the time right now, and it's useful enough to merge as is!
we can iterate on it in future PRs.

Python 3.11 changed the field default mutability check for dataclasses to only allow defaults which are hashable.

This codemod helps with the migration by changing all default values that aren't obviously hashable to use `default_factory` instead.

Note: it's impossible to accurately determine if a particular expression produces a hashable value in a codemod, so the codemod significantly over-approximates what's unhashable.
Copy link

meta-cla bot commented Aug 15, 2025

Hi @zsol!

Thank you for your pull request.

We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and yours needs attention.

You currently have a record in our system, but the CLA is no longer valid, and will need to be resubmitted.

Process

In order for us to review and merge your suggested changes, please sign at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need to sign the corporate CLA.

Once the CLA is signed, our tooling will perform checks and validations. Afterwards, the pull request will be tagged with CLA signed. The tagging process may take up to 1 hour after signing. Please give it that time before contacting us about it.

If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at [email protected]. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants