-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
Add support for DistributedNext (and add DistributedNext as a weakdep) #80
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #80 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 93.61% 91.83% -1.79%
==========================================
Files 2 3 +1
Lines 94 98 +4
==========================================
+ Hits 88 90 +2
- Misses 6 8 +2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
@JamesWrigley @jpsamaroo Does this look correct? |
Hmmm. Is this going to be sufficient? Because, if I look here: SlurmClusterManager.jl/src/slurmmanager.jl Line 182 in 11d491c
I see that SlurmClusterManager is starting (under |
Yeah that won't work, for DistributedNext you'd want to call I might also suggest putting Distributed support in a package extension too, that way people only need to load one or the other packages. |
Hmmm. Unfortunately, the |
If we're going to need to make a change anyway, would it be worth exposing a public interface to the user, that provides a general interface for the user to specify the worker arg? E.g. something like #74? My motivation for #74 was that I wanted to be able to start workers with |
Oh I forgot that's a requirement of implementing the cluster interface. But then won't it be necessary to subtype |
No description provided.