Skip to content

Conversation

maotsuk
Copy link
Contributor

@maotsuk maotsuk commented Jul 31, 2025

CSS has received multiple cases where customers report that the script does not account for NICs assigned to the AppGW backend pool. If a NIC with a Basic Public IP is upgraded using this script, it will be removed from the AppGW backend pool. Customers must manually reassign the NIC after the script runs — but many are unaware of this until it's too late. Therefore, I strongly recommend adding this Q&A to the MS Learn page to help prevent confusion and reduce support cases.

CSS has received multiple cases where customers report that the script does not account for NICs assigned to the AppGW backend pool.
If a NIC with a Basic Public IP is upgraded using this script, it will be removed from the AppGW backend pool.
Customers must manually reassign the NIC after the script runs — but many are unaware of this until it's too late.
Therefore, I strongly recommend adding this Q&A to the MS Learn page to help prevent confusion and reduce support cases.
Copy link
Contributor

@maotsuk : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) and reviewer(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

@maotsuk maotsuk changed the title Need to add an explanation of behavior of the script for AppGW - Update public-ip-upgrade-vm.md Need to add explanation of script behavior for AppGW backend pool - Update public-ip-upgrade-vm.md Jul 31, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit 797399f:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
articles/virtual-network/ip-services/public-ip-upgrade-vm.md ✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

Copy link
Contributor

@mbender-ms mbender-ms left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@maotsuk Please accept the suggestions for spelling out Application Gateway.

@ttorble
Copy link
Contributor

ttorble commented Jul 31, 2025

Thanks @mbender-ms

IMPORTANT: When the changes are ready for publication, adding a #sign-off comment is the best way to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge.

#label:"aq-pr-triaged"
@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

@prmerger-automator prmerger-automator bot added the aq-pr-triaged tracking label for the PR review team label Jul 31, 2025
Thank you for your confirmation!
" AppGW = Application Gateway " so, I accept this suggestion!

Co-authored-by: Michael Bender <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit a2fb02f:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
articles/virtual-network/ip-services/public-ip-upgrade-vm.md ✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

@mbender-ms
Copy link
Contributor

#sign-off

Copy link
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit 7ca8b1d:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
articles/virtual-network/ip-services/public-ip-upgrade-vm.md ✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

@v-dirichards v-dirichards merged commit 8cdfd41 into MicrosoftDocs:main Aug 5, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants