Skip to content

Conversation

widhalmt
Copy link
Member

fixes #70

@widhalmt widhalmt added the feature New feature or request label Feb 24, 2023
@widhalmt widhalmt added this to the 1.0.0 milestone Feb 24, 2023
@widhalmt widhalmt self-assigned this Feb 24, 2023
@widhalmt
Copy link
Member Author

Need #113 to be merged before checks can run through

@widhalmt widhalmt enabled auto-merge March 8, 2023 12:18
Copy link
Member

@mocdaniel mocdaniel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Two minor questions, but looks good overall.

@widhalmt widhalmt added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 8, 2023
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to no response for status checks Mar 8, 2023
@widhalmt widhalmt added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 9, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit 0c047c8 Mar 9, 2023
@widhalmt widhalmt deleted the feature/es_port_70 branch March 9, 2023 10:40
ivareri pushed a commit to ivareri/ansible-collection-elasticstack that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2025
* Undo broken logging configuration
* Configure log4j
* Fix some lint

fixes NETWAYS#113
ivareri pushed a commit to ivareri/ansible-collection-elasticstack that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Set Elasticsearch port via variable
2 participants