Skip to content

FIX incorrect error message for invalid uuidv4 client ID#291

Open
gitKashish wants to merge 1 commit intoOpenpanel-dev:mainfrom
gitKashish:patch_incorrect_client_id_err_msg
Open

FIX incorrect error message for invalid uuidv4 client ID#291
gitKashish wants to merge 1 commit intoOpenpanel-dev:mainfrom
gitKashish:patch_incorrect_client_id_err_msg

Conversation

@gitKashish
Copy link

@gitKashish gitKashish commented Feb 13, 2026

Currently if we send an invalid UUID V4 as Client ID in payload, a seemingly misleading error.

It seems like it is a minor typo. Please consider the change.

image

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved clarity in validation error messages for Client ID format requirements.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 13, 2026

@gitKashish is attempting to deploy a commit to the Coderax's projects Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 13, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Updated an error message in UUID validation within the authentication utility, changing the error text from "Ingestion: Clean ID must be a valid UUIDv4" to "Ingestion: Client ID must be a valid UUIDv4" for improved clarity.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Error Message Clarification
apps/api/src/utils/auth.ts
Updated error message in validateSdkRequest from "Clean ID" to "Client ID" for improved clarity during UUID validation.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 A message most muddled was changed with great care,
From "Clean" into "Client"—a fix so fair,
One line in the code, yet the clarity shines,
When errors are clearer, all logic aligns! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3 | ❌ 1
❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: correcting an error message from 'Clean ID' to 'Client ID' in UUID validation logic.
Merge Conflict Detection ✅ Passed ✅ No merge conflicts detected when merging into main

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

Tip

Issue Planner is now in beta. Read the docs and try it out! Share your feedback on Discord.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant