Skip to content

Conversation

Earthcomputer
Copy link
Contributor

Needed to update the Java and gradle version

@sciwhiz12 sciwhiz12 added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 13, 2025
@sciwhiz12 sciwhiz12 self-requested a review July 13, 2025 16:03
implementation 'org.parchmentmc.feather:io-moshi:1.0.0.3'
implementation 'com.google.guava:guava:33.4.0-jre'
implementation 'net.fabricmc.unpick:unpick-format-utils:2.3.0'
implementation 'net.fabricmc.unpick:unpick-format-utils:3.0.0-beta.8'
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not sure we want to use Beta versions?

@sciwhiz12 What do you think? I am on the fence i want this to be stable before it gets added....

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should go ahead with this update given that loom has added support for unpick v3 and that support in JST was recently merged. I believe the library is in beta because given v3 is quite new and had quite a few changes there might be bugs (I wouldn't expect any in what we use - the parser, that is, maybe in the applicator there might be), but otherwise the format is quite final.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

May as well update to the latest beta before merging though

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, we can update to Unpick V3. I don't see why not; yes, it's in beta, but there doesn't seem to be any changes to the format since this PR was made, and I don't think there will be any changes afterwards until 'full' release.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants