You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Here are some key observations to aid the review process:
⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 4 🔵🔵🔵🔵⚪
🧪 No relevant tests
🔒 Security concerns
Code injection vulnerability: The component uses eval() to execute JavaScript code extracted from chat messages without any validation, sanitization, or sandboxing. This creates a critical security vulnerability where malicious actors could execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the user's browser, potentially accessing sensitive data, making unauthorized requests, or performing other malicious actions. The regex-based code extraction from markdown also lacks proper validation and could be bypassed.
The use of eval() to execute arbitrary JavaScript code from chat messages poses a significant security vulnerability. This allows execution of potentially malicious code without any validation or sandboxing.
The code extraction and execution logic lacks proper error handling. If the regex fails or eval() throws an exception, it could crash the component or expose sensitive error information.
The scrollbar initialization and DOM manipulation could lead to memory leaks if the component is destroyed without proper cleanup. No cleanup logic is provided in onDestroy.
function initScrollbar() {
const elem = document.querySelector(`#js-interpreter-scrollbar-${scrollbarId}`);
if (elem) {
// @ts-ignore
const scrollbar = OverlayScrollbars(elem, options);
}
}
Using eval() to execute arbitrary JavaScript code poses a critical security vulnerability. Malicious code could be executed, leading to XSS attacks or data theft. Consider using a sandboxed JavaScript execution environment or a safer alternative like a restricted code parser.
function initCode() {
const text = message?.rich_content?.message?.text || message?.text || '';
const parsedText = marked.lexer(text);
// @ts-ignore
const codeText = parsedText.find(token => token.type === 'code' || token.type === 'html')?.text || '';
const code = codeText.replace(/<script\b[^>]*>([\s\S]*?)<\/script>/i, '$1');
- eval(code);++ // TODO: Replace eval with a secure code execution method+ // Consider using a sandboxed environment or code validation+ try {+ // Validate code before execution+ if (isValidChartCode(code)) {+ eval(code);+ }+ } catch (error) {+ console.error('Code execution failed:', error);+ }
}
Apply / Chat
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 10
__
Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a critical security vulnerability by flagging the use of eval() on user-provided content, which could lead to XSS attacks.
Here are some key observations to aid the review process:
⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 4 🔵🔵🔵🔵⚪
🧪 No relevant tests
🔒 Security concerns
Code injection vulnerability: The JavaScript interpreter component uses eval() to execute arbitrary code from chat messages without any sanitization or sandboxing. This creates a severe security risk as malicious users could execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the browser context, potentially accessing sensitive data, manipulating the DOM, or performing other malicious actions. The component also loads external scripts dynamically based on message content, which could be exploited to load malicious scripts from untrusted sources.
The component uses eval() to execute arbitrary JavaScript code from chat messages, which poses significant security risks including XSS attacks and code injection vulnerabilities.
The script loading mechanism removes existing scripts with the same src and reloads them, which could cause memory leaks or unexpected behavior with global state.
const curScripts = document.head.getElementsByTagName("script");
const found = Array.from(curScripts).find(x => x.src === src);
if (found) {
found.remove();
}
Using eval() to execute arbitrary code poses significant security risks. Consider implementing a sandboxed JavaScript execution environment or using a safer alternative like a restricted parser for specific use cases.
-setTimeout(() => eval(code), 0);+// Consider using a sandboxed execution environment+// or implement proper code validation before execution+setTimeout(() => {+ try {+ // Add validation and sandboxing here+ new Function(code)();+ } catch (error) {+ console.error('Code execution error:', error);+ }+}, 0);
Apply / Chat
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 10
__
Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a critical security vulnerability by pointing out the use of eval() on potentially untrusted code, which could lead to severe exploits.
High
General
Avoid removing existing scripts
Removing existing scripts before loading new ones could break functionality if other components depend on those scripts. Consider checking if the script is already loaded instead of removing it.
Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a flawed logic that could break other components by removing a shared script, proposing a much safer and more efficient approach.
Medium
Possible issue
Add proper property validation
The code assumes all filtered objects have a text property, but the filter only checks for truthiness. This could cause runtime errors if objects exist but don't have the expected structure.
Why: The suggestion improves code robustness by adding a more explicit check for the existence and type of the text property, preventing potential runtime errors if the data structure is not as expected.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Type
Enhancement
Description
Add JavaScript interpreter component for executing code in chat
Refine scrollbar ID generation and markdown styling
Add program code rich type support
Improve script loading with multiple source handling
Diagram Walkthrough
File Walkthrough
Markdown.svelte
Improve scrollbar ID handling
src/lib/common/markdown/Markdown.svelte
rc-js-interpreter.svelte
Add JavaScript interpreter component
src/routes/chat/[agentId]/[conversationId]/rich-content/rc-js-interpreter.svelte
rc-message.svelte
Integrate JS interpreter in messages
src/routes/chat/[agentId]/[conversationId]/rich-content/rc-message.svelte
rich-content.svelte
Refactor conditional rendering logic
src/routes/chat/[agentId]/[conversationId]/rich-content/rich-content.svelte
enums.js
Add program code rich type
src/lib/helpers/enums.js
ProgramCode
enum value to RichTypehttp.js
Update markdown replacement pattern
src/lib/helpers/http.js
@@@
conversationTypes.js
Add language property to rich content
src/lib/helpers/types/conversationTypes.js
language
property to IRichContent prototype