Skip to content

Conversation

@iceljc
Copy link
Collaborator

@iceljc iceljc commented Oct 20, 2025

PR Type

Bug fix


Description

  • Fix edit message functionality by correcting response handling

  • Update deleteConversationMessage callback to properly extract messageId

  • Ensure sendChatMessage receives correct inputMessageId parameter


Diagram Walkthrough

flowchart LR
  A["deleteConversationMessage"] -- "returns res object" --> B["Extract res.messageId"]
  B -- "pass to sendChatMessage" --> C["sendChatMessage with correct inputMessageId"]
Loading

File Walkthrough

Relevant files
Bug fix
chat-box.svelte
Fix message deletion response handling in edit flow           

src/routes/chat/[agentId]/[conversationId]/chat-box.svelte

  • Fixed the callback parameter name in deleteConversationMessage from
    resMessageId to res
  • Updated sendChatMessage call to access messageId property from the
    response object via res.messageId
  • Corrects the data flow when editing and deleting messages in the chat
    interface
+2/-2     

@qodo-merge-pro
Copy link

qodo-merge-pro bot commented Oct 20, 2025

PR Compliance Guide 🔍

Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:

Security Compliance
🟢
No security concerns identified No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.
Ticket Compliance
🎫 No ticket provided
- [ ] Create ticket/issue <!-- /create_ticket --create_ticket=true -->

</details></td></tr>
Codebase Duplication Compliance
Codebase context is not defined

Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.

Custom Compliance
No custom compliance provided

Follow the guide to enable custom compliance check.

  • Update
Compliance status legend 🟢 - Fully Compliant
🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label

@qodo-merge-pro
Copy link

qodo-merge-pro bot commented Oct 20, 2025

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Impact
General
Refactor to use async/await syntax

Refactor the confirmEditMsg function to use async/await with a
try...catch...finally block. This will improve readability, centralize cleanup
logic, and add proper error handling.

src/routes/chat/[agentId]/[conversationId]/chat-box.svelte [1182-1187]

-		deleteConversationMessage(params.conversationId, truncateMsgId, true).then(res => {
-			sendChatMessage(editText, { postback: postback, inputMessageId: res.messageId }).then(() => {
-				resetEditMsg();
-			}).catch(() => {
-				resetEditMsg();
-			});
-		}).catch(() => {
+		try {
+			const res = await deleteConversationMessage(params.conversationId, truncateMsgId, true);
+			await sendChatMessage(editText, { postback: postback, inputMessageId: res.messageId });
+		} catch (error) {
+			console.error('Failed to confirm message edit:', error);
+		} finally {
 			resetEditMsg();
-		});
+		}
  • Apply / Chat
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

__

Why: The suggestion correctly points out that an async function should use await instead of promise chains, and the proposed refactoring to a try/catch/finally block improves readability, reduces code duplication, and adds error handling.

Medium
  • Update

@iceljc iceljc merged commit 3de9387 into SciSharp:main Oct 20, 2025
1 of 2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant