You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Replace ProductTemplate with ProgramCodeTemplate message type
Update messaging enums and parser for code templates
Minor template name refactoring in file handler
Diagram Walkthrough
flowchart LR
A["User Request"] --> B["ChartHandler Plugin"]
B --> C["PlotChartFn"]
C --> D["LLM Processing"]
D --> E["JavaScript Code Generation"]
E --> F["ProgramCodeTemplateMessage"]
F --> G["Chart Rendering"]
Here are some key observations to aid the review process:
⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 3 🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪
🧪 No relevant tests
🔒 Security concerns
Code injection vulnerability: The GenerateChartFn generates JavaScript code from LLM output and wraps it in a JsCodeTemplateMessage without any validation or sanitization. This JavaScript code could potentially contain malicious scripts that execute in the user's browser, leading to XSS attacks. The LLM-generated code should be validated, sanitized, or executed in a sandboxed environment before being sent to the client.
The LLM model is hardcoded to "gpt-4.1" which may not exist or be available in all environments. This should be configurable or use a fallback mechanism.
The function generates JavaScript code from LLM output and returns it directly without validation or sanitization, which could lead to XSS vulnerabilities when executed in the browser.
The instruction template is hardcoded to only generate pie charts, but the function description suggests it can generate charts "in any format that user requested".
Please take a look at "Requirement" and generate a javascript code that can be used to render a pie chart on a canvas element with id {{ chart_element_id }}.
The model name "gpt-4.1" appears to be invalid as OpenAI's GPT-4 models typically use naming conventions like "gpt-4" or "gpt-4-turbo". This will likely cause API failures when attempting to generate chart code.
Why: The suggestion correctly identifies that "gpt-4.1" is not a standard OpenAI model name, and using it would likely cause the feature to fail at runtime.
High
Add null safety for deserialization
If message.FunctionArgs is null or invalid JSON, the deserialization will fail and throw an exception. Add null checking and exception handling to prevent runtime crashes.
[To ensure code accuracy, apply this suggestion manually]
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7
__
Why: This is a good defensive coding suggestion that prevents a potential ArgumentNullException if message.FunctionArgs is null, improving the code's robustness.
Medium
General
✅ Remove hardcoded chart type restrictionSuggestion Impact:The entire file content was removed, including the hardcoded "pie chart" text that the suggestion aimed to fix
code diff:
-Please take a look at "Requirement" and generate a javascript code that can be used to render a pie chart on a canvas element with id {{ chart_element_id }}.
The instruction hardcodes "pie chart" but the function accepts any plotting requirement. This limits flexibility and may not match user requests for other chart types like bar charts or line graphs.
-Please take a look at "Requirement" and generate a javascript code that can be used to render a pie chart on a canvas element with id {{ chart_element_id }}.+Please take a look at "Requirement" and generate a javascript code that can be used to render the requested chart on a canvas element with id {{ chart_element_id }}.
[Suggestion processed]
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8
__
Why: The suggestion correctly points out that hardcoding "pie chart" in the prompt unnecessarily restricts the LLM's output, conflicting with the goal of handling general chart requests.
Here are some key observations to aid the review process:
⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 3 🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪
🧪 No relevant tests
🔒 Security concerns
Code injection: The ChartHandler generates and executes JavaScript code based on user input without proper sanitization. The LLM-generated JavaScript code in ProgramCodeTemplateMessage could potentially contain malicious scripts that execute in the client browser, leading to XSS vulnerabilities. The plotting_requirement parameter is passed directly to the LLM without validation, allowing users to potentially inject malicious instructions.
The function hardcodes the OpenAI model "gpt-4.1" which may not exist or be available in all environments. This could cause runtime failures and should be configurable.
The catch block only logs warnings but returns the error message as chart content, which could expose internal error details to users and may not render properly as JavaScript code.
catch(Exceptionex){varerror=$"Error when plotting chart. {ex.Message}";_logger.LogWarning(ex,error);returnerror;}
The class uses JsonPropertyName attribute but doesn't include the necessary using statement for System.Text.Json.Serialization, which could cause compilation errors.
[JsonPropertyName("rich_type")]publicstringRichType=> RichTypeEnum.ProgramCode;[JsonPropertyName("text")]publicstringText{get;set;}=string.Empty;[JsonPropertyName("template_type")]
public virtual stringTemplateType{get;set;}=TemplateTypeEnum.ProgramCode;[JsonPropertyName("language")]publicstringLanguage{get;set;}=string.Empty;
The model name "gpt-4.1" appears to be invalid. OpenAI's GPT-4 models typically use names like "gpt-4" or "gpt-4-turbo". This will likely cause API calls to fail with an invalid model error.
Why: The suggestion correctly identifies that gpt-4.1 is not a valid OpenAI model name, which would cause the new chart plotting feature to fail.
High
Add null safety check
The deserialization could fail if message.FunctionArgs is null or contains invalid JSON, causing a runtime exception. Add null checking and error handling to prevent crashes.
Why: The suggestion correctly points out a potential ArgumentNullException if message.FunctionArgs is null, and the proposed change makes the deserialization process more robust by handling this case gracefully.
Medium
High-level
Hardcoded LLM provider and model
The PlotChartFn hardcodes "openai" provider and "gpt-4.1" model in the GetChatCompletion method. This creates tight coupling and prevents configuration flexibility. Consider using dependency injection or configuration to make the LLM provider and model configurable.
Why: The suggestion correctly identifies hardcoded LLM provider and model names in PlotChartFn, which limits flexibility and contradicts the platform's provider-agnostic design.
Medium
General
Make template type readonly
The TemplateType property should be read-only like other template message classes to maintain consistency. Making it settable could lead to inconsistent template type values.
Why: This is a good suggestion for improving code quality and consistency, as making the TemplateType property read-only prevents accidental modification and aligns with the design of other similar classes in the codebase.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Type
Enhancement
Description
Add new ChartHandler plugin for AI chart plotting
Replace ProductTemplate with ProgramCodeTemplate message type
Update messaging enums and parser for code templates
Minor template name refactoring in file handler
Diagram Walkthrough
File Walkthrough
14 files
Update parser for ProgramCodeTemplate support
Add ProgramCode rich type enum
Replace Product with ProgramCode template type
Remove ProductTemplateMessage class
Add ProgramCodeTemplateMessage with language support
Create main ChartHandler plugin class
Define ChartPlotter utility name constant
Implement chart plotting function with LLM
Register chart plotting utility hook
Define input context for plotting requirements
Define output context for generated code
Add chart plotting function template
Add detailed chart plotting instructions
Define chart plotting function schema
1 files
Update template name reference
7 files
Add global using statements for plugin
Add ChartHandler project to solution
Update template file references
Create ChartHandler project configuration
Remove unused template file reference
Add ChartHandler plugin reference
Enable ChartHandler plugin in configuration
1 files
Remove commented image URL property
1 files