Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions src/ir/subtype-exprs.h
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -133,6 +133,9 @@ struct SubtypingDiscoverer : public OverriddenVisitor<SubType> {
void visitBreak(Break* curr) {
if (curr->value) {
self()->noteSubtype(curr->value, self()->findBreakTarget(curr->name));
if (curr->condition) {
self()->noteSubtype(curr->value, curr);
}
}
}
void visitSwitch(Switch* curr) {
Expand Down
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions test/gtest/CMakeLists.txt
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ set(unittest_SOURCES
public-type-validator.cpp
scc.cpp
stringify.cpp
subtype-exprs.cpp
suffix_tree.cpp
topological-sort.cpp
type-builder.cpp
Expand Down
79 changes: 79 additions & 0 deletions test/gtest/subtype-exprs.cpp
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we add an Unsubtyping lit test for this instead? That will be less code and easier to maintain with auto-update scripts.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unfortunately no. Here is what such a testcase would look like:

(module
 (type $super (sub (struct)))
 (type $sub (sub $super (struct)))

 (func $block-fallthrough
  (local $super (ref $super))
  (drop
   (block $l (result (ref $sub))
    ;; The value flowing out of the br_if requires $sub <: $super
    (local.set $super
     (br_if $l
      (struct.new $sub)
      (i32.const 0)
     )
    )
    (unreachable)
   )
  )
 )
)

This PR adds a subtyping link from the br_if to its value child, but this testcase works without it: Unsubtyping also sees the connection between the local.set to the br_if, using the br_if's type. So the wasm type system helps us here. This is, I assume, why we didn't see this bug without the fuzzer.

The fuzzer hits this issue because it needs to know more than Unsubtyping. Unsubtyping infers we must keep the subtyping in this testcase - it only cares about the type level - while when the fuzzer mutates, it needs to know which types it can replace specific things with. We do need the link between the br_if and its child, for that: That informs us about the child, so we know what types it can contain.

Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
/*
* Copyright 2025 WebAssembly Community Group participants
*
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
* You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
* limitations under the License.
*/

#include "ir/subtype-exprs.h"
#include "wasm-traversal.h"
#include "wasm.h"
#include "gtest/gtest.h"

using namespace wasm;

static Type anyref = Type(HeapType::any, Nullable);

// A BrIf must require of its value to both match the block it targets, and
// also the BrIf itself, as the value flows out.
TEST(SubtypeExprsTest, BrIf) {
Module wasm;
Builder builder(wasm);
// A br_if in a block, whose value is a null.
auto* null = builder.makeRefNull(HeapType::any);
auto* c = builder.makeConst(Literal(int32_t(42)));
auto* brIf = builder.makeBreak("block", null, c);
auto* block = builder.makeBlock("block", {brIf}, anyref);
auto* drop = builder.makeDrop(block);
auto func = builder.makeFunction(
"func", {}, Signature(Type::none, Type::none), {}, drop);

// Implement a SubtypingDiscoverer.
struct Finder
: public ControlFlowWalker<Finder, SubtypingDiscoverer<Finder>> {
std::set<Expression*> seen;

void noteSubtype(Type sub, Type super) {}
void noteSubtype(HeapType sub, HeapType super) {}
void noteSubtype(Type sub, Expression* super) {}
void noteSubtype(Expression* sub, Type super) {}
void noteSubtype(Expression* sub, Expression* super) {
if (sub->is<RefNull>()) {
// The null will be called with two constraints: the block (the null is
// sent there) and also the break (the null flows out through it).
seen.insert(super);
}
}
void noteNonFlowSubtype(Expression* sub, Type super) {}
void noteCast(HeapType src, Type dst) {}
void noteCast(Expression* src, Type dst) {}
void noteCast(Expression* src, Expression* dst) {}
} finder;

finder.walkFunctionInModule(func.get(), &wasm);

// We should have seen both things.
ASSERT_EQ(finder.seen.size(), 2);
EXPECT_EQ(finder.seen.count(brIf), 1);
EXPECT_EQ(finder.seen.count(block), 1);

// Remove the condition from the br. Now it is unreachable and no value
// flows out.
brIf->condition = nullptr;
brIf->type = Type::unreachable;

// We should now only see the sent value - nothing flows out to the br_if.
finder.seen.clear();
finder.walkFunctionInModule(func.get(), &wasm);
ASSERT_EQ(finder.seen.size(), 1);
EXPECT_EQ(finder.seen.count(block), 1);
}
Loading