-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 265
remove tryForCollectionName function #3456
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: feature/mini-runtime-release
Are you sure you want to change the base?
remove tryForCollectionName function #3456
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🤖 AI Security analysis: "Automated scan of the single changed file found no security issues and no auto-fixes were applied. Continue normal review processes to ensure coverage beyond this tool’s checks."
| Risk Level | AI Score |
|---|---|
| 🟢 NO RISK | 0.0/100 |
Top 0 security issues / 0 total (Critical: 0, High: 0, Medium: 0, Low: 0)
| Title | Location | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| — | — | No issues to display |
ba63bab
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🤖 AI Security analysis: "Security scan of this 2-file change found no issues. Residual risks remain from undetected vulnerabilities, missing dynamic or supply-chain checks, and environment misconfiguration; maintain standard security controls and reviews."
| Risk Level | AI Score |
|---|---|
| 🟢 NO RISK | 5.0/100 |
Top 0 security issues / 0 total (Critical: 0, High: 0, Medium: 0, Low: 0)
| Title | Location | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| — | — | No issues to display |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🤖 AI Security analysis: "Security scan of the 3 changed files reported no findings. No high- or medium-severity issues were identified, but environment-specific or undetected vulnerabilities could still exist."
| Risk Level | AI Score |
|---|---|
| 🟢 NO RISK | 0.0/100 |
Top 0 security issues / 0 total (Critical: 0, High: 0, Medium: 0, Low: 0)
| Title | Location | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| — | — | No issues to display |
| if (p.nextToken() != JsonToken.START_OBJECT) return headers; | ||
|
|
||
| String currentKey = null; | ||
| while (p.nextToken() != JsonToken.END_OBJECT) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is the same alibaba library... if closing } is not found then infinite loop.
No description provided.