-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.1k
MAPREDUCE-7508.FileInputFormat can throw ArrayIndexOutofBoundsException because of some concurrent execution. #7859
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
liangyu-1
wants to merge
2
commits into
apache:trunk
Choose a base branch
from
liangyu-1:MAPREDUCE-7508
base: trunk
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+3
−0
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for your contributions. Just wonder why it will meet
length != 0
butblkLocations.length == 0
, some corner case that lead inconsistent metadata of NameNode?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Hexiaoqiao thanks for review.
It is a rare corner case, only happens when using spark streaming monitors a path where the upstream system sometimes starts two identical tasks that attempt to create and write to the same HDFS file simultaneously. This can lead to conflicts where a file is created and written to twice in quick succession.
When Spark scans for files, it uses the FileInputFormat.getSplits() method to split the file. The first step in getSplits is to retrieve the file's length. If the file length is not zero, the next step is to get the block locations array for that file. However, if the two upstream programs rapidly create and write to the same file (i.e., the file is overwritten or appended to almost simultaneously), a race condition may occur:
The file's length is already non-zero, but calling getFileBlockLocations() returns an empty array because the file is being overwritten or is not yet fully written.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks. Got it. Make sense to me. +1 to check in.
BTW, the root cause here is invoke
listStatus
to get file status and invoke another interfacegetFileBlockLocations
to get block location, but file has changed between this steps, right? If it is true, is it proper to useblkLocations
only as condition at L364 rather thanfile.length
which could be not the correct result here? Thanks again.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for your review. It is a good solution to use
blkLocations
only as condition at L364, if blkLocations array is empty,file.length
is also empty, this will not effect the later opretions.