[refactor][client] Introduce PulsarApiMessageId to access fields of MessageIdData #18890
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
Currently the
MessageIdinterface hiddens all fields of theMessageIdDatastruct defined inPulsarApi.proto. It's usually enough for application users because they don't need to access the fields. But for client developers and developers of other Pulsar ecosystems (e.g. the built-in Kafka connector and the Flink connector in another repo), theMessageIdinterface is too simple and there is no common used abstraction. We can see many code usages like:These
MessageIdimplementations are used directly. It's a very bad design because any change to the public APIs of these implementations could bring breaking changes.Also, there is a
TopicMessageIdImplthat each time agetInnerMessageId()method must be used to get the underlyingMessageIdobject, then do the type assertion and cast again. It makes code unnecessarily complicated.Modifications
Introduce the
PulsarApiMessageIdinterface into thepulsar-commonmodule. AllMessageIdimplementations so far (exceptMultiMessageId) should extend this interface so we can do the following conversion safely in client code or other modules:Regarding the
ack_setfield, use aBitSetinstead of theBatchMessageAckerto record if a message in the batch is acknowledged.Since the
TopicMessageIdis just a proxy of otherMessageIdimplementations, it's stored as key or value in the map directly because thecompareTo/equal/hashCodemethods have the same semantics with the underlyingMessageId. There is no need to cast the type and callgetInnerMessageId.Remove all other usages and mark the public methods as deprecated to avoid breaking changes. They could be removed in the next major release.
Documentation
docdoc-requireddoc-not-neededdoc-completeMatching PR in forked repository
PR in forked repository: BewareMyPower#11