Skip to content

Conversation

mfori
Copy link
Member

@mfori mfori commented Oct 8, 2025

Document sub-schema support in input-schema specification page in docs.

@mfori mfori self-assigned this Oct 8, 2025
@mfori mfori requested a review from TC-MO as a code owner October 8, 2025 10:01
@mfori mfori added the t-console Issues with this label are in the ownership of the console team. label Oct 8, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 125th sprint - Console team milestone Oct 8, 2025
@mfori mfori requested a review from GriffinTrent October 8, 2025 10:02
@apify-service-account
Copy link

Preview for this PR was built for commit 1748854d and is ready at https://pr-1992.preview.docs.apify.com!

@mfori mfori requested review from gippy and patrikbraborec October 8, 2025 10:05
@apify-service-account
Copy link

Preview for this PR was built for commit 03a3df43 and is ready at https://pr-1992.preview.docs.apify.com!

Copy link
Member

@gippy gippy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Haven't gone too deep reviewing it. Just checked if the location of the docs and the text themselves make sense to me.

One comment is that maybe we should restructure the whole input schema doc in later PR. It's too large now. We could maybe have a general page and then one page for each type of input?

@mfori
Copy link
Member Author

mfori commented Oct 9, 2025

Haven't gone too deep reviewing it. Just checked if the location of the docs and the text themselves make sense to me.

One comment is that maybe we should restructure the whole input schema doc in later PR. It's too large now. We could maybe have a general page and then one page for each type of input?

Good idea, also I would put the available fields for each type at the top of the type-specific section, and the example below. Currently you need to scroll down through all the examples to see the actual table with fields.

@TC-MO
Copy link
Contributor

TC-MO commented Oct 15, 2025

Yeah I concur this is getting a little bit unwieldy. Unfortunately with curren workload I have very little capacity to try and address it until December. But I'm not sure about that approach that would be adding a lot of additional pages, let me try to think how to best approach it from information architecture POV

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

t-console Issues with this label are in the ownership of the console team.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants