-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 131
docs(platform:actors): Actor quality score #2005
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Preview for this PR was built for commit |
Preview for this PR was built for commit |
Just one comment, otherwise it looks good. Thanks! Good job. |
Preview for this PR was built for commit |
From what it needs to communicate, I think it works well. One nitpick from me would be regarding the formatting. It's a lot of text, and I wonder if we could break it into bullet points and some bold sentences, etc., to make it visually clearer. It's not something that should block it. We can always improve it later, so it's an approve from me. |
I'll agree it kind of wall-of-text, I will be taking proper look at it today I'll try to break it up into smaller chunks Just FYI, per our style guide, bold is reserved for UI elements. At the same time bullet lists, bolded sentences, emojis are dead giveaway of AI/LLM generated content, we do not want our docs to look AI/LLM generated. We want to make our content easily digestable by AI/LLMs, which we can accomplish by making it concise, and adhere with technical writing principles |
|
Article for Actor quality score. Each public Actor receives a score which tells the owner how well it is performing. There are seven main quality fields which are independently considered. The Actor quality score is the combined value of those.