Simplify headings

[stnguyen90]

What does this PR do?

Remove unnecessary text since content is already nested under databases/operators.

Test Plan

Manual

Related PRs and Issues

• Add DB operators docs #2538

Have you read the Contributing Guidelines on issues?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated navigation labels and paths for database operators documentation.
  • Refined page titles and section headings for improved clarity.
  • Updated internal documentation links across blog posts and guides to reflect new URL structure.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This pull request updates documentation routing and content for database operators. The changes include: updating documentation links from /docs/products/databases/db-operators to /docs/products/databases/operators across two blog posts and the databases layout navigation; updating the navigation label from "Database operators" to "Operators"; and refactoring the operators documentation page title and section headings from plural to singular form (e.g., "Numeric operators" to "Numeric").

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

• Verify that the new path /docs/products/databases/operators is properly configured and accessible
• Confirm all link references are consistently updated across blog posts and navigation
• Check that heading changes in the documentation page don't break any internal cross-references or anchors

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title 'Simplify headings' accurately reflects the main change in the changeset—simplifying documentation headings from plural/descriptive forms to singular forms across multiple files.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch chore-db-operators-headings

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cd85057 and 88e21e4.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)

• src/routes/blog/post/announcing-db-operators/+page.markdoc (1 hunks)
• src/routes/blog/post/race-conditions-db-operators/+page.markdoc (2 hunks)
• src/routes/docs/products/databases/+layout.svelte (1 hunks)
• src/routes/docs/products/databases/operators/+page.markdoc (6 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)

• GitHub Check: build
• GitHub Check: tests

🔇 Additional comments (6)

src/routes/blog/post/announcing-db-operators/+page.markdoc (1)

108-108: LGTM! Documentation link correctly updated.

The link update aligns with the new simplified path structure.

src/routes/blog/post/race-conditions-db-operators/+page.markdoc (1)

70-70: LGTM! Documentation links correctly updated.

Both link updates consistently reflect the new simplified path structure.

Also applies to: 120-120

src/routes/docs/products/databases/+layout.svelte (1)

110-111: LGTM! Navigation updates are consistent.

The simplified label "Operators" is clearer given the "Databases" parent context, and the href correctly points to the new path.

Consider verifying that appropriate redirects are in place for the old /docs/products/databases/db-operators URL to prevent broken external links.

src/routes/docs/products/databases/operators/+page.markdoc (3)

3-3: LGTM! Title simplification improves clarity.

The shortened title "Operators" is appropriate since the page is already nested under the Databases section.

---

297-297: LGTM! Section heading simplified appropriately.

The change from "Operator categories" to "Operator" aligns with the overall simplification goal.

---

301-301: No stale anchor references found—verification complete.

Comprehensive searches across all file types (markdown, HTML, JavaScript, TypeScript, Svelte, and others) reveal no references to the old anchor IDs (#numeric-operators, #array-operators, #string-operators, #date-operators, #boolean-operators) anywhere in the codebase. The heading simplification from plural to singular forms does not break any internal or external links.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[adityaoberai]

Suggested change

	# Operator {% #operators %}
	# Operators {% #operators %}

[adityaoberai]

I would probably retain this or maybe say Types of operators

[stnguyen90]

We should not use "Types of operators" because we should keep things short, direct, and not repeat when we're already on a page for database operators

[adityaoberai]

Based on Eldad's recommendation, we should move this to Concepts

[stnguyen90]

Closing as @adityaoberai will address these and other feedback from Eldad.