Skip to content

Conversation

@dani-garcia
Copy link
Member

🎟️ Tracking

📔 Objective

We weren't passing through the WASM feature flag in the core and vault crates, which were leading to some compilation issues when doing some SM builds.

⏰ Reminders before review

  • Contributor guidelines followed
  • All formatters and local linters executed and passed
  • Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable
  • Protected functional changes with optionality (feature flags)
  • Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings
  • CI builds passed
  • Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements
  • Updated any necessary documentation (Confluence, contributing docs) or informed the documentation
    team

🦮 Reviewer guidelines

  • 👍 (:+1:) or similar for great changes
  • 📝 (:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info
  • ❓ (:question:) for questions
  • 🤔 (:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed
    issue and could potentially benefit from discussion
  • 🎨 (:art:) for suggestions / improvements
  • ❌ (:x:) or ⚠️ (:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention
  • 🌱 (:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt
  • ⛏ (:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Logo
Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details15749441-66ba-4b81-8aa1-dc03ed83926f

Great job! No new security vulnerabilities introduced in this pull request

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 17, 2025

🔍 SDK Breaking Change Detection Results

SDK Version: ps/add-wasm-feature-flag-to-state (e8bbdb3)
Completed: 2025-11-17 17:19:49 UTC
Total Time: 216s

Client Status Details
typescript ✅ No breaking changes detected TypeScript compilation passed with new SDK version - View Details

Breaking change detection completed. View SDK workflow

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 17, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 79.71%. Comparing base (32a8d8a) to head (e8bbdb3).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #562   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   79.71%   79.71%           
=======================================
  Files         300      300           
  Lines       32238    32238           
=======================================
  Hits        25697    25697           
  Misses       6541     6541           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@dani-garcia dani-garcia marked this pull request as ready for review November 17, 2025 17:35
@dani-garcia dani-garcia requested review from a team as code owners November 17, 2025 17:35
@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Nov 17, 2025

Claude Code is working…

I'll analyze this and get back to you.

View job run

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants