-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
Support new DeprecatedInfo
format for rule meta.deprecated
#730
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
error-four-o-four
wants to merge
9
commits into
bmish:main
Choose a base branch
from
error-four-o-four:chore/metadata-issue-512
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8c38608
feat: implement `DeprecatedInfo`
error-four-o-four 4436953
test: add tests for `DeprecatedInfo`
error-four-o-four a0f8b6f
Merge branch 'main' into chore/metadata-issue-512
error-four-o-four 783837b
Merge branch 'main' into chore/metadata-issue-512
error-four-o-four 22be021
Merge branch 'main' into chore/metadata-issue-512
error-four-o-four d90c3bb
cleanup: remove the warning
error-four-o-four 479b0d8
fixing as per suggestions
error-four-o-four ede4a08
test: update deprecation tests
error-four-o-four 4903b0d
docs: update in-house example `require-baz`
error-four-o-four File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To your question about this, I think I would still like to automatically fill in links for rules where we can. Including URLs in rule definitions is burdensome, and while rules theoretically could be responsible for it now, I assume many will omit it. However, we can try to use
getLinkToRule
as a follow-up if you'd like, doesn't have to be in the first version.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd like to give it a shot. But first let me check if I understood it correctly and considered the relevant cases:
In case a user of
eslint-doc-generator
has setReplacedByInfo#url
we're good to go. Otherwise we'd usegetLinkToRule
as a fallback. The one case that's bothering me is when onlyReplacedByInfo#name
is set. If it has a plugin prefix we should compare it with the argumentpluginPrefix
to determine if it's an internal or external rule because we can't rely onReplacedByInfo#plugin
being set. If the name does not have a plugin prefix,getLinkToRule
is used to determine if it is a built-in eslint rule or a internal plugin rule, right?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not totally sure.
getLinkToRule
might not handle every situation here.If any scenarios are ambiguous or overly-complicated, we can just omit the link in them and consider as a follow-up.