Skip to content

Rubocop files #42

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Rubocop files #42

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

nimratcoderabbit
Copy link

@nimratcoderabbit nimratcoderabbit commented Jul 15, 2025

image

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new method that prints a message when the input is true.
    • Added a method that prints eleven sequentially labeled lines.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 15, 2025

Walkthrough

A new Ruby file introduces two methods: one that assigns and overwrites a local variable, checks if an input is exactly true, and prints a message; another that prints eleven sequentially numbered lines. No additional logic or error handling is present.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
test_file.rb Added with two methods: doStuff(input) and long_method; both perform simple print operations and variable assignments.

Poem

In a file so new, two methods appear,
One checks for true, the other prints clear.
Eleven lines march, each in a row,
The rabbit observes as the outputs flow.
With every hop, the code takes flight—
Simple, direct, and shining bright!

Impact Analysis

Introduction of new methods: doStuff and long_method

📢 Medium 🔗 Impacts API

A new Ruby file introduces two methods, doStuff and long_method, which are now available for use. Users of this codebase can now call these methods to print specific output based on input or to print a sequence of lines, respectively.

Test calling both methods directly to verify their output matches expectations. Check edge cases for doStuff, such as passing values other than true, and ensure long_method prints all intended lines.

🔍 Related Files
  • test_file.rb
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ef04b8d and 6484dc9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • test_file.rb (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 RuboCop (1.76.1)
test_file.rb

[warning] 2-2: Useless assignment to variable - foo.

(Lint/UselessAssignment)


[warning] 3-3: Useless assignment to variable - foo.

(Lint/UselessAssignment)

Comment on lines +2 to +3
foo = 1
foo = 2 # useless reassignment
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Remove useless variable assignments.

The variable foo is assigned twice but never used. Both assignments are unnecessary and flagged by RuboCop.

-  foo = 1
-  foo = 2 # useless reassignment
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
foo = 1
foo = 2 # useless reassignment
🧰 Tools
🪛 RuboCop (1.76.1)

[warning] 2-2: Useless assignment to variable - foo.

(Lint/UselessAssignment)


[warning] 3-3: Useless assignment to variable - foo.

(Lint/UselessAssignment)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In test_file.rb around lines 2 to 3, the variable `foo` is assigned twice but
never used, making both assignments unnecessary. Remove both assignments to
eliminate the useless variable assignments flagged by RuboCop.

Comment on lines +5 to +6
if input == true
puts "value is true" # double quotes used unnecessarily
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Simplify boolean comparison and use single quotes.

The comparison input == true is not idiomatic Ruby - use input directly. Also, use single quotes for strings without interpolation.

-  if input == true
-    puts "value is true" # double quotes used unnecessarily
+  if input
+    puts 'value is true'
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
if input == true
puts "value is true" # double quotes used unnecessarily
if input
puts 'value is true'
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In test_file.rb around lines 5 to 6, simplify the boolean comparison by
replacing `input == true` with just `input`. Also, change the string from double
quotes to single quotes since it does not require interpolation, updating `puts
"value is true"` to use single quotes instead.

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
def doStuff(input) # bad method name, camelCase
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Use snake_case for method names.

Ruby convention uses snake_case for method names, not camelCase.

-def doStuff(input) # bad method name, camelCase
+def do_stuff(input)
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
def doStuff(input) # bad method name, camelCase
-def doStuff(input) # bad method name, camelCase
+def do_stuff(input)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In test_file.rb at line 1, the method name doStuff uses camelCase which is
against Ruby conventions. Rename the method to use snake_case, for example,
change doStuff to do_stuff to follow Ruby's standard naming style.

Comment on lines +10 to +22
def long_method
puts 'line1'
puts 'line2'
puts 'line3'
puts 'line4'
puts 'line5'
puts 'line6'
puts 'line7'
puts 'line8'
puts 'line9'
puts 'line10'
puts 'line11'
end
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Refactor repetitive code using a loop.

The method contains repetitive puts statements that violate the DRY principle. This can be refactored to use a loop for better maintainability.

 def long_method
-  puts 'line1'
-  puts 'line2'
-  puts 'line3'
-  puts 'line4'
-  puts 'line5'
-  puts 'line6'
-  puts 'line7'
-  puts 'line8'
-  puts 'line9'
-  puts 'line10'
-  puts 'line11'
+  (1..11).each { |i| puts "line#{i}" }
 end
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
def long_method
puts 'line1'
puts 'line2'
puts 'line3'
puts 'line4'
puts 'line5'
puts 'line6'
puts 'line7'
puts 'line8'
puts 'line9'
puts 'line10'
puts 'line11'
end
def long_method
(1..11).each { |i| puts "line#{i}" }
end
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In test_file.rb around lines 10 to 22, the method contains repetitive puts
statements that print sequential lines. Refactor this by replacing the multiple
puts calls with a loop that iterates from 1 to 11 and prints each line
dynamically. This will reduce code repetition and improve maintainability.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant