Skip to content

Preview/pylint #61

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Preview/pylint #61

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

alexcoderabbitai
Copy link

@alexcoderabbitai alexcoderabbitai commented Jul 16, 2025

image

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a sample script with basic variable assignments and print statements.
  • Chores
    • Added configuration files for code review and linting tools to enforce code quality and style guidelines.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 16, 2025

Walkthrough

Three new files are introduced: .coderabbit.yaml for configuring code review tools, .pylintrc.toml for Pylint static analysis configuration, and test.py as a Python script containing simple variable assignments and intentional errors for testing purposes.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.coderabbit.yaml Added configuration to disable the "ruff" tool for code reviews.
.pylintrc.toml Introduced Pylint configuration with strict checks, formatting, naming, and reporting rules.
test.py Added a Python script with a syntax error, a TypeError, and two new integer variables.

Poem

In the warren, new rules now dwell,
With Pylint’s watchful, colorized spell.
A test script hops in, tripping with glee—
Syntax and TypeErrors for all to see!
No “ruff” today, says the YAML decree,
CodeRabbit reviews with carrot jubilee! 🥕

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ef04b8d and dccf788.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .coderabbit.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .pylintrc.toml (1 hunks)
  • test.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)
.coderabbit.yaml

[error] 4-4: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🪛 Pylint (3.3.7)
test.py

[error] 1-1: Parsing failed: 'unterminated string literal (detected at line 1) (test, line 1)'

(E0001)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
.coderabbit.yaml (1)

1-6: Configuration looks good.

The CodeRabbit configuration correctly disables the ruff tool to avoid conflicts with oxlint when biome is enabled. This is a sensible approach to prevent tool conflicts.

.pylintrc.toml (1)

1-53: Comprehensive pylint configuration looks excellent.

This configuration establishes strict linting standards with:

  • Very low fail-under threshold (10.0) ensuring high code quality
  • Comprehensive checks enabled across all categories
  • Reasonable complexity limits for maintainable code
  • Proper disallowing of placeholder variable names

The configuration is well-structured and will enforce good coding practices.

Comment on lines +4 to +5
ruff:
enabled: false
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix trailing spaces.

The static analysis tool detected trailing spaces on line 4. Please remove them for cleaner formatting.

Apply this diff to fix the trailing spaces:

-    ruff: 
+    ruff:
       enabled: false
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
ruff:
enabled: false
ruff:
enabled: false
🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)

[error] 4-4: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .coderabbit.yaml at line 4, there are trailing spaces after the key "ruff:".
Remove any spaces or tabs at the end of this line to ensure clean formatting and
comply with static analysis requirements.

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
print("Hello World')
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix the syntax error.

The string literal has mismatched quotation marks, causing a parsing error that prevents proper linting and execution.

Apply this diff to fix the syntax error:

-print("Hello World')
+print("Hello World")
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
print("Hello World')
print("Hello World")
🧰 Tools
🪛 Pylint (3.3.7)

[error] 1-1: Parsing failed: 'unterminated string literal (detected at line 1) (test, line 1)'

(E0001)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In test.py at line 1, the print statement has mismatched quotation marks causing
a syntax error. Fix this by ensuring both the opening and closing quotes are the
same type, for example, change the closing single quote to a double quote to
match the opening double quote.

Comment on lines +4 to +5
test=1
foo=2
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Variable names violate pylint configuration.

The variables test and foo are listed as disallowed names in the .pylintrc.toml configuration. This will trigger pylint warnings.

Apply this diff to use more descriptive variable names:

-test=1
-foo=2
+sample_value=1
+another_value=2
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
test=1
foo=2
sample_value=1
another_value=2
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In test.py around lines 4 to 5, the variable names `test` and `foo` violate the
pylint configuration as they are disallowed names. Rename these variables to
more descriptive and meaningful names that comply with the pylint rules to avoid
warnings.

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
print("Hello World')
print(1+"a")
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix the TypeError.

Attempting to add an integer and string will raise a TypeError at runtime.

Apply this diff to fix the type error:

-print(1+"a")
+print(str(1)+"a")  # or print(1+ord("a")) depending on intent
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
print(1+"a")
print(str(1)+"a") # or print(1+ord("a")) depending on intent
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In test.py at line 2, the code attempts to add an integer and a string, causing
a TypeError. To fix this, convert the integer to a string before concatenation
or convert the string to an integer if appropriate. Modify the expression so
both operands are of the same type to avoid the TypeError.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants