Skip to content

[Snyk] Upgrade typescript from 6.0.3 to 7.0.2 - #77

Closed
Aravind-Kumar-cstk wants to merge 83 commits into
mainfrom
snyk-upgrade-b5850a30ba3f857920e2b6b3a986efa6
Closed

Aravind-Kumar-cstk wants to merge 83 commits into
mainfrom
snyk-upgrade-b5850a30ba3f857920e2b6b3a986efa6

Conversation

@Aravind-Kumar-cstk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade typescript from 6.0.3 to 7.0.2.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 2 versions ahead of your current version.

  • The recommended version was released 21 days ago.

Breaking Change Risk

Merge Risk: High

Notice: This assessment is enhanced by AI.

Release notes
Package name: typescript from typescript GitHub release notes

Important

  • Warning: This PR contains a major version upgrade, and may be a breaking change.
  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

nandeesh-gajula and others added 30 commits June 26, 2025 18:50
chore: bump version to 0.0.2 and update dependencies
Update dependencies and enhance Contentstack integration with custom …
Update dependencies and version bump to 0.0.4; add TypeScript ignore …
…@tailwindcss/vite to version 4.1.16 and adding new devDependencies: @emnapi/core, @napi-rs/wasm-runtime, and emnapi.
sunil-lakshman and others added 24 commits May 20, 2026 16:19
replace @timbenniks/contentstack-endpoints with @contentstack/utils
Add @rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu, @rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl,
lightningcss-linux-x64-gnu, and lightningcss-linux-x64-musl as
optionalDependencies and regenerate lockfile so Linux CI environments
can resolve native platform binaries without hitting the npm optional
dependency bug.
chore: add Linux optional dependencies for Rollup and LightningCSS
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
updated astro, made it closer to the default setup
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Snyk has created this PR to upgrade typescript from 6.0.3 to 7.0.2.

See this package in npm:
typescript

See this project in Snyk:
[snyk-project-url-redacted]
@Aravind-Kumar-cstk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Merge Risk: High

This major version upgrade introduces a complete rewrite of the TypeScript compiler from TypeScript to Go, resulting in significant performance improvements but also critical breaking changes.

Key Breaking Changes:

  • No Programmatic API: TypeScript 7.0 does not ship with the programmatic API that many tools in the ecosystem rely on. Builds that use tools like ts-node, typescript-eslint, webpack loaders (e.g., ts-loader), or framework-specific tooling (Vue, Svelte, Angular) will likely fail. A new API is planned for version 7.1.
  • Stricter Compiler Defaults: Several tsconfig.json options now have stricter defaults. Projects that do not explicitly set these may fail to compile where they previously passed.
    • strict is now true by default.
    • module defaults to esnext.
    • types defaults to an empty array ([]), meaning ambient type definitions (e.g., @types/node) are no longer automatically included.
  • Removed Deprecations: Flags and features deprecated in TypeScript 6.x are now hard errors.

Recommendation:
This upgrade carries a high risk of breaking existing build and CI/CD pipelines. Do not merge until you have verified that your project and all its dependencies (especially linters, test runners, and bundlers) are compatible with TypeScript 7. You may need to explicitly adjust your tsconfig.json to match the previous behavior. For projects that depend on the programmatic API, it is recommended to wait for tooling to be updated or for TypeScript 7.1 to be released.

Notice 🤖: This content was augmented using artificial intelligence. AI-generated content may contain errors and should be reviewed for accuracy before use.

@Aravind-Kumar-cstk
Aravind-Kumar-cstk requested a review from a team July 30, 2026 01:32
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔒 Security Scan Results

ℹ️ Note: Only vulnerabilities with available fixes (upgrades or patches) are counted toward thresholds.

Check Type Count (with fixes) Without fixes Threshold Result
🔴 Critical Severity 0 0 10 ✅ Passed
🟠 High Severity 0 3 25 ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium Severity 0 46 500 ✅ Passed
🔵 Low Severity 0 0 1000 ✅ Passed

⏱️ SLA Breach Summary

✅ No SLA breaches detected. All vulnerabilities are within acceptable time thresholds.

Severity Breaches (with fixes) Breaches (no fixes) SLA Threshold (with/no fixes) Status
🔴 Critical 0 0 15 / 30 days ✅ Passed
🟠 High 0 0 30 / 120 days ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium 0 0 90 / 365 days ✅ Passed
🔵 Low 0 0 180 / 365 days ✅ Passed

ℹ️ Vulnerabilities Without Available Fixes (Informational Only)

The following vulnerabilities were detected but do not have fixes available (no upgrade or patch). These are excluded from failure thresholds:

  • Critical without fixes: 0
  • High without fixes: 3
  • Medium without fixes: 46
  • Low without fixes: 0

✅ BUILD PASSED - All security checks passed

@harshitha07d
harshitha07d force-pushed the snyk-upgrade-b5850a30ba3f857920e2b6b3a986efa6 branch from bab3153 to 96f8425 Compare August 7, 2026 11:01
@harshitha07d
harshitha07d deleted the snyk-upgrade-b5850a30ba3f857920e2b6b3a986efa6 branch August 7, 2026 11:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants