Skip to content

Conversation

@eisenwave
Copy link
Member

Related to #2076

I'm not sure if it's worth dismantling all uses of \textit. There are ~150 left. This is just picking some low-hanging fruits in wording that might still be visited from time to time.

@eisenwave eisenwave added the P2-Bug Presentational errors and omissions label Nov 6, 2025
using int16_t = @\textit{signed integer type}@; // optional
using int32_t = @\textit{signed integer type}@; // optional
using int64_t = @\textit{signed integer type}@; // optional
using int8_t = @\UNSPnc{signed integer type}@; // optional
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since we were using \placeholder for "value" in the other commit, I think this would also be better as a placeholder (i.e. \placeholdernc)? I don't think UNSP was meant to be reused like that, though using it for "see " in the other other commit seems OK.

@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Nov 7, 2025

Thanks! Could you have a look also in text.tex, that also contains three instances of "see \ref{...}" in a \textit.

@eisenwave
Copy link
Member Author

I'll put it on my list of things to do once the repo is public and I can make updates to my PRs without things exploding.

@eisenwave eisenwave added the changes requested Changes to the wording or approach have been requested and not yet applied. label Nov 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

changes requested Changes to the wording or approach have been requested and not yet applied. P2-Bug Presentational errors and omissions

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants