Skip to content

[special] Add "direct" when defining "potentially constructed subobjects" #8501

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 12, 2025
Merged

[special] Add "direct" when defining "potentially constructed subobjects" #8501

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion source/classes.tex
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1227,7 +1227,7 @@
\end{itemize}

\pnum
For a class, its non-static data members, its non-virtual direct base classes,
For a class, its direct non-static data members, its non-virtual direct base classes,
and, if the class is not abstract\iref{class.abstract}, its virtual base
classes are called its \term{potentially constructed subobjects}.

Expand Down