Preserve outer scalar allOf constraints - #3946
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reachedNext included review available in 32 minutes. View limit detailsLimit details: You’ve used all 8 included reviews currently available. You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. Review configuration: ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Team Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (10)
📒 Files selected for processing (34)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Merging this PR will degrade performance by 10.92%
|
| Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | test_perf_large_models_typed_dict[total-false-requiredness] |
442.5 ms | 501.4 ms | -11.74% |
| ❌ | test_perf_large_models_typed_dict[legacy-requiredness] |
436.7 ms | 490.4 ms | -10.95% |
| ❌ | test_perf_simple_pydantic_v2_field_construction |
11 ms | 12.3 ms | -10.59% |
| ❌ | test_perf_large_models_pydantic_v2_builtin_double_quotes |
581.9 ms | 649.4 ms | -10.39% |
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing fix/allof-root-outer-constraints (5341702) with main (22ee9fd)2
Footnotes
-
98 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩
-
No successful run was found on
fix/allof-pattern-searches(30a0e25) during the generation of this report, somain(22ee9fd) was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩
|
📚 Docs Preview: https://pr-3946.datamodel-code-generator.pages.dev |
No description provided.