Skip to content

Conversation

@smalyshev
Copy link
Contributor

@smalyshev smalyshev requested a review from a team as a code owner November 24, 2025 23:21
@smalyshev smalyshev requested a review from quux00 November 24, 2025 23:22
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 24, 2025

Following you can find the validation changes against the target branch for the APIs.

API Status Request Response
connector.secret_delete 🟠 → 🟢 Missing type → 4/4 Missing type → 4/4
connector.secret_get 🟠 → 🟢 Missing type → 11/11 Missing type → 11/11
connector.secret_post 🟠 → 🟢 Missing type → 9/9 Missing type → 9/9
connector.secret_put 🟠 → 🟢 Missing type → 4/4 Missing type → 4/4
fleet.delete_secret 🟠 → ⚪ Missing type → Missing test Missing type → Missing test
fleet.get_secret 🟠 → ⚪ Missing type → Missing test Missing type → Missing test
fleet.post_secret 🟠 → ⚪ Missing type → Missing test Missing type → Missing test

You can validate these APIs yourself by using the make validate target.

Copy link
Contributor

@quux00 quux00 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Requested change in the project_routing description.

"params": {
"project_routing": {
"type": "string",
"description": "A Lucene query using project metadata tags to limit which projects to search, such as _alias:_origin or _alias:*pr*."
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think for this endpoint, this description (which you probably grabbed from the other endpoints) is misleading, since this usage is different and doesn't actually search linked projects.

So I would like something (for this endpoint only) more like:

A Lucene query using project metadata tags used to filter which projects are returned in the response, such as ...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated

@smalyshev smalyshev requested a review from quux00 November 25, 2025 20:57
Copy link
Contributor

@quux00 quux00 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@smalyshev smalyshev added the skip-backport This pull request should not be backported label Nov 25, 2025
@smalyshev smalyshev merged commit bcc1230 into main Nov 25, 2025
11 of 12 checks passed
@smalyshev smalyshev deleted the project_routing branch November 25, 2025 22:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

serverless skip-backport This pull request should not be backported specification

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants