-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.6k
ESQL: Handle release of 9.2 in test #137070
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
I'd made a mistake in elastic#136327 when writing the test for fetching fields that the release of 9.2.0 revealed. This fixes it and adds one more test that we needed from elastic#136327.
|
Pinging @elastic/es-analytical-engine (Team:Analytics) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks Nik! Looks good, just minor comments.
| yield equalTo("aggregate_metric_double"); | ||
| } | ||
| case DENSE_VECTOR -> { | ||
| logger.error("ADFDAFAF " + minVersion()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Leftover?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yup. will zap
| Map<String, Object> response; | ||
| try { | ||
| String request = """ | ||
| | EVAL strjunk = TO_STRING(f_aggregate_metric_double) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this needed? There's more junk below to trigger the workaround, and this is not kept.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll leave a comment - yeah, it is.
I'd made a mistake in elastic#136327 when writing the test for fetching fields that the release of 9.2.0 revealed. This fixes it and adds one more test that we needed from elastic#136327.
💚 All backports created successfully
Questions ?Please refer to the Backport tool documentation |
I'd made a mistake in elastic#136327 when writing the test for fetching fields that the release of 9.2.0 revealed. This fixes it and adds one more test that we needed from elastic#136327. (cherry picked from commit cd3839c) # Conflicts: # server/src/main/resources/transport/upper_bounds/9.3.csv # x-pack/plugin/esql/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/esql/action/EsqlResolveFieldsResponse.java
I'd made a mistake in #136327 when writing the test for fetching fields that the release of 9.2.0 revealed. This fixes it and adds one more test that we needed from #136327. (cherry picked from commit cd3839c) # Conflicts: # server/src/main/resources/transport/upper_bounds/9.3.csv # x-pack/plugin/esql/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/esql/action/EsqlResolveFieldsResponse.java Co-authored-by: Nik Everett <[email protected]>
I'd made a mistake in elastic#136327 when writing the test for fetching fields that the release of 9.2.0 revealed. This fixes it and adds one more test that we needed from elastic#136327.
I'd made a mistake in #136327 when writing the test for fetching fields that the release of 9.2.0 revealed. This fixes it and adds one more test that we needed from #136327.