Skip to content

Add senseBox Eye board #11608

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 11 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Add senseBox Eye board #11608

wants to merge 11 commits into from

Conversation

PaulaScharf
Copy link
Contributor

Description of Change

Adding the senseBox Eye board.

Tests scenarios

I have tested this pull request on the senseBox Eye board.

Related links

@PaulaScharf PaulaScharf requested a review from P-R-O-C-H-Y as a code owner July 18, 2025 12:10
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 18, 2025

Messages
📖 🎉 Good Job! All checks are passing!

👋 Hello PaulaScharf, we appreciate your contribution to this project!


📘 Please review the project's Contributions Guide for key guidelines on code, documentation, testing, and more.

🖊️ Please also make sure you have read and signed the Contributor License Agreement for this project.

Click to see more instructions ...


This automated output is generated by the PR linter DangerJS, which checks if your Pull Request meets the project's requirements and helps you fix potential issues.

DangerJS is triggered with each push event to a Pull Request and modify the contents of this comment.

Please consider the following:
- Danger mainly focuses on the PR structure and formatting and can't understand the meaning behind your code or changes.
- Danger is not a substitute for human code reviews; it's still important to request a code review from your colleagues.
- To manually retry these Danger checks, please navigate to the Actions tab and re-run last Danger workflow.

Review and merge process you can expect ...


We do welcome contributions in the form of bug reports, feature requests and pull requests.

1. An internal issue has been created for the PR, we assign it to the relevant engineer.
2. They review the PR and either approve it or ask you for changes or clarifications.
3. Once the GitHub PR is approved we do the final review, collect approvals from core owners and make sure all the automated tests are passing.
- At this point we may do some adjustments to the proposed change, or extend it by adding tests or documentation.
4. If the change is approved and passes the tests it is merged into the default branch.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 0dcb1d1

@lucasssvaz lucasssvaz added the Type: 3rd party Boards Related to third-party/non-Espressif hardware boards. label Jul 18, 2025
@P-R-O-C-H-Y P-R-O-C-H-Y added the Status: Awaiting Response awaiting a response from the author label Jul 18, 2025
@P-R-O-C-H-Y P-R-O-C-H-Y added Status: Review needed Issue or PR is awaiting review and removed Status: Awaiting Response awaiting a response from the author labels Jul 21, 2025
Copy link
Member

@P-R-O-C-H-Y P-R-O-C-H-Y left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. @PaulaScharf just please change the rat code to use Arduino API as me-no-dev commented.

@P-R-O-C-H-Y P-R-O-C-H-Y added Status: Awaiting Response awaiting a response from the author and removed Status: Review needed Issue or PR is awaiting review labels Jul 22, 2025
@PaulaScharf
Copy link
Contributor Author

thank you, that makes the variant.cpp much slimmer :)

@P-R-O-C-H-Y P-R-O-C-H-Y added Status: Pending Merge Pull Request is ready to be merged and removed Status: Awaiting Response awaiting a response from the author labels Jul 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: Pending Merge Pull Request is ready to be merged Type: 3rd party Boards Related to third-party/non-Espressif hardware boards.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants