Skip to content

feat(github): remove ESP32 forum from issue template #11639

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Parsaabasi
Copy link

@Parsaabasi Parsaabasi commented Jul 25, 2025

Description of Change

Revomed the issue template since it was redundant. As it was agreed with the team to remove it.

@Parsaabasi Parsaabasi requested a review from pedrominatel as a code owner July 25, 2025 10:38
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 25, 2025

Messages
📖 🎉 Good Job! All checks are passing!

👋 Hello Parsaabasi, we appreciate your contribution to this project!


📘 Please review the project's Contributions Guide for key guidelines on code, documentation, testing, and more.

🖊️ Please also make sure you have read and signed the Contributor License Agreement for this project.

Click to see more instructions ...


This automated output is generated by the PR linter DangerJS, which checks if your Pull Request meets the project's requirements and helps you fix potential issues.

DangerJS is triggered with each push event to a Pull Request and modify the contents of this comment.

Please consider the following:
- Danger mainly focuses on the PR structure and formatting and can't understand the meaning behind your code or changes.
- Danger is not a substitute for human code reviews; it's still important to request a code review from your colleagues.
- To manually retry these Danger checks, please navigate to the Actions tab and re-run last Danger workflow.

Review and merge process you can expect ...


We do welcome contributions in the form of bug reports, feature requests and pull requests.

1. An internal issue has been created for the PR, we assign it to the relevant engineer.
2. They review the PR and either approve it or ask you for changes or clarifications.
3. Once the GitHub PR is approved we do the final review, collect approvals from core owners and make sure all the automated tests are passing.
- At this point we may do some adjustments to the proposed change, or extend it by adding tests or documentation.
4. If the change is approved and passes the tests it is merged into the default branch.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 5c24611

Copy link
Member

@pedrominatel pedrominatel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@lucasssvaz lucasssvaz added Type: CI & Testing Related to continuous integration, automated testing, or test infrastructure. Status: Pending CLA ⚠️ Contributor is required to sign the CLA and removed Type: CI & Testing Related to continuous integration, automated testing, or test infrastructure. labels Jul 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: Pending CLA ⚠️ Contributor is required to sign the CLA
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants