Skip to content

in_tail: permission error handling #10690

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kyo-ke
Copy link

@kyo-ke kyo-ke commented Aug 5, 2025

Changer glob logic for tail input plugin.
Currently if path wildcard matches directories which have insufficient permission, entire tail plugin will fail.
By this PR just show warn and keep reading from file with sufficient permission and just show warning.

#10656


Enter [N/A] in the box, if an item is not applicable to your change.

Testing
Before we can approve your change; please submit the following in a comment:

  • Example configuration file for the change
  • Debug log output from testing the change
  • Attached Valgrind output that shows no leaks or memory corruption was found

If this is a change to packaging of containers or native binaries then please confirm it works for all targets.

  • Run local packaging test showing all targets (including any new ones) build.
  • Set ok-package-test label to test for all targets (requires maintainer to do).

Documentation

  • Documentation required for this feature

Backporting

  • Backport to latest stable release.

Fluent Bit is licensed under Apache 2.0, by submitting this pull request I understand that this code will be released under the terms of that license.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added a configuration option to skip directories with permission errors during scanning, allowing continued processing of accessible directories.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced error handling to avoid scan failures caused by permission issues when the new skip option is enabled.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 5, 2025

Walkthrough

A new boolean configuration option, skip_permission_errors, has been introduced to the in_tail plugin. This option allows the plugin to skip directories with permission errors during glob scanning, instead of failing entirely. Supporting logic was added to the configuration structure and the glob scanning function to implement this behavior.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Config Option Addition
plugins/in_tail/tail.c, plugins/in_tail/tail_config.h
Introduced the skip_permission_errors boolean option in the config map and added an int skip_permission_errors field to the flb_tail_config struct.
Glob Scanning Logic
plugins/in_tail/tail_scan_glob.c
Updated tail_scan_path to check the skip_permission_errors flag. On permission error (GLOB_ABORTED), logs a warning and retries glob scan (without GLOB_ERR) if skipping is enabled.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant TailPlugin
    participant FileSystem

    User->>TailPlugin: Start plugin with skip_permission_errors option
    TailPlugin->>FileSystem: Perform glob scan (with GLOB_ERR)
    FileSystem-->>TailPlugin: Permission error (GLOB_ABORTED)
    alt skip_permission_errors enabled
        TailPlugin->>TailPlugin: Log warning, retry glob scan (without GLOB_ERR)
        FileSystem-->>TailPlugin: Return accessible files/directories
        TailPlugin->>User: Continue processing
    else skip_permission_errors disabled
        TailPlugin->>User: Fail plugin initialization
    end
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Possibly related issues

Poem

A bunny hopped through files galore,
Skipping errors it found at the door.
"Permission denied?" it gave a shrug—
Retries the scan with a gentle tug.
Now logs are gathered, neat and bright,
Even when some doors are shut tight!
🐇✨

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3c8411f and 90999fb.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • plugins/in_tail/tail.c (1 hunks)
  • plugins/in_tail/tail_config.h (1 hunks)
  • plugins/in_tail/tail_scan_glob.c (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • plugins/in_tail/tail.c
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • plugins/in_tail/tail_scan_glob.c
  • plugins/in_tail/tail_config.h
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@sandy2008 sandy2008 force-pushed the in_tail_permission_err_handling branch from 3c8411f to 90999fb Compare August 5, 2025 00:52
@sandy2008
Copy link

Thanks @kyo-ke 🙌 — solid work on the glob fallback logic!

The new skip_permission_errors option makes the tail input plugin far more resilient in real-world scenarios where permission inconsistencies are common (especially in multi-tenant environments or containerized workloads).

We've tested the changes with a mix of readable and unreadable directories, and the plugin now gracefully logs warnings and continues scanning valid paths as expected. No memory leaks observed via Valgrind, and everything looks clean on our end.

@kyo-ke kyo-ke changed the title In tail permission err handling in_tail: permission err handling Aug 5, 2025
@kyo-ke kyo-ke changed the title in_tail: permission err handling in_tail: permission error handling Aug 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants