-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.1k
vmm: optimize vioapic_write() #1838
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
jbendtsen
wants to merge
1
commit into
freebsd:main
Choose a base branch
from
jbendtsen:optimize-vmm-vioapic_write
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unfortunately there are other fields that can change that can affect the trigger mode such as the delivery mode (probably rarely changed), or if you were to change which local APIC you are sending the interrupt to (as the old LAPIC needs to disable it and the new LAPIC needs to enable the bit in TMR), or the IDT vector for the interrupt changes (you need to clear the old TMR bit and set the new one).
Do you know which bits are actually changing in this case?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here's the data. Note that vioapic_write() is being called from vm_handle_inst_emul(), ie. the Windows 11 kernel.
TL;DR Windows is selecting the APIC ID to receive an interrupt. No other changes are being made. All other fields are 0 except the interrupt vector.
I ended up (ab)using printf to extract out the information from just before this if statement. I attempted to buffer the information and write it to a file in one go, in order to combat the delay caused by printf, but opening the file seemed to result in EFAULT for some reason.
From https://wiki.osdev.org/IOAPIC ...
Note that in this example, the VM has been given 8 cores. Sure enough, only bits 56, 57, and 58 are changing.
I don't know what Windows is trying to achieve, but if I had to guess, it might be some kind of task dispatcher that distributes across all available cores.
In any case, the patch as is has been tested and works just fine, which indicates that Windows 11 doesn't seem to be interested in constantly reconfiguring LAPIC. Perhaps a more accurate fix can determined.
How aboutif ((changed & ~(IOART_INTMASK | IOART_INTPOL)) && (changed & ~(0xffUL << 56)) != 0) {
instead? ie. if something changed that wasn't just the physical CPU ID of the interrupt target.EDIT: I just realized that with this implementation, there's no way of knowing whether the other fields changed once you've observed a change in the destination APIC, since the high and low words are written separately. The solution would therefore need to store the previous value for the low word, and use that to determine whether the destination change requires any work to be done.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's worth noting that vioapic_update_tmr doesn't do any meaningful work if the previous TMR bit was edge and the new TMR bit is also edge.
It's also worth emphasizing that fixing this issue solves the problem of Windows 11 not being viable on bhyve.