Skip to content

Remove deprecated auth sources #35272

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 14 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

techknowlogick
Copy link
Member

Entra ID users should use the OIDC oauth2 provider.

They will still be shown if the instance has a previous Azure AD source configured.

Entra ID users should use the OIDC oauth2 provider
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Aug 13, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the modifies/go Pull requests that update Go code label Aug 13, 2025
@techknowlogick techknowlogick requested a review from lunny August 15, 2025 18:36
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Aug 17, 2025
@techknowlogick techknowlogick requested a review from lunny August 18, 2025 03:23
@techknowlogick techknowlogick requested a review from lunny August 18, 2025 15:18
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Aug 18, 2025
@lunny lunny added the type/enhancement An improvement of existing functionality label Aug 18, 2025
@lunny lunny added this to the 1.25.0 milestone Aug 18, 2025
@lunny lunny added the reviewed/wait-merge This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon. label Aug 18, 2025
return nil
}

var existingAzureProviders []string
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wouldn't it make sense to check this in SQL (WHERE provider IN ('…'))?

providers := make([]Provider, 0, len(gothProviders))
existAuthSources := getExistingAzureADAuthSources(ctx)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

existingAzureSources?


for _, provider := range gothProviders {
if slices.Contains(azureProviders, provider.Name()) && !slices.Contains(existAuthSources, provider.Name()) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't that an gothProviders = gothProviders.Remove(existingAzureSources)?
(Although it will probably look different since the stdlib doesn't seem to support that method…)

@techknowlogick techknowlogick removed the reviewed/wait-merge This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon. label Aug 18, 2025
Comment on lines +95 to +100
authSources, err := db.Find[auth.Source](ctx, auth.FindSourcesOptions{
LoginType: auth.OAuth2,
})
if err != nil {
return nil
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It shouldn't silently ignore an unknown error.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. modifies/go Pull requests that update Go code type/enhancement An improvement of existing functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants