MCP Trust Score #6
Conversation
|
he is just spammer(PR and commit ai generated), he want to put his no-name ai slop project in your repo |
|
There are multiple companies building catalogs and distributing badges, that's a way for us to bring attention to the project. Catalog is not our product, it's a side project. As I'm aware, we're the only ones who have open-sourced the whole catalog, including evaluation metrics. Our badge doesn't take 25% of the screen like a few others. Knowing all that, I assumed that asking MCP builders for support would be a valid request. I'm not a spammer, and I wrote those messages myself using my own keyboard. Our company is new, and not a lot of people know about us, so I may guess that's the reason why you jumped to conclusions, but I believe that the approach should matter, not the brand name. Our approach is focused on the Open Source and openness. Everyone agrees that awareness is an issue and the community needs a good catalog. If you have any objective comments on how we could improve the catalog, please let me know. For the context, here is my LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/motakuk/ feel free to reach out to me at any moment [email protected] |
Hi!
This PR adds the "Trust Score" badge from our new Open Source MCP catalog.
Our catalog evaluates MCP servers based on technical quality—like protocol feature implementation and dependency health—rather than vanity metrics like GitHub stars.
The scoring process is fully transparent and reproducible:
The badge is designed to be respectful to the structure of your readme, example:
Projects like Grafana MCP (https://github.com/grafana/mcp-grafana) are already participating.
We believe that transparent and truly open source MCP catalog should help the community to identify great MCP servers like yours 😊
We'd appreciate your support by merging this PR!