add info on MAST #4
Conversation
|
@adam-parker1 I think we have more mappings for MAST than this, right? |
|
It depends if you separate those that are mapped and what is actually available. Lots and lots of things were mapped previously for MAST with the old mapping stack (stephen could say more but I can't seem to add him here). However, with the new framework I think just 'summary' is accurate and that might even be a stretch. James made a start on converting the old mappings for MAST but they were never finalised |
|
Hum... Indeed in the 2023 survey MAST declared to have 8 IDS being partially mapped. The idea is to have a starting point for further discussion, collaborations, etc... And I guess that old mappings may always serve as a source of knowledge if one decide to use a new mapping framework. So for now, I propose to focus on mapping only (even it the mappings were applied as a test, on a single pulse), without requirements on this information being applicable with current software, on recent pulses... What do you think? |
Adding the little info I am aware of for MAST, if you agree that it goes into this open repo @NathanCummings . Feel free to correct or complete this entry.