Skip to content

Conversation

hcsum
Copy link

@hcsum hcsum commented Dec 8, 2024

The validateField function now consistently returns Promise<string | undefined>, where string represents a validation error message, undefined represents a successful validation.

before this change:

  • validation via <Field validate={...}> returned Promise<string | undefined>
  • validation via schema returned Promise<void>

Closes #2021

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Dec 8, 2024

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 4362233

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 2 packages
Name Type
formik Patch
formik-native Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 8, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
formik-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Dec 8, 2024 4:41am

Copy link

codesandbox-ci bot commented Dec 8, 2024

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

@hcsum
Copy link
Author

hcsum commented Jan 13, 2025

@quantizor @jaredpalmer happy new year! can help review this small PR?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

return value for validateField

2 participants