-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 309
perf: Add flag to disable costly metrics controllers #2354
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
perf: Add flag to disable costly metrics controllers #2354
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: DerekFrank The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Hi @DerekFrank. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 16630012081Details
💛 - Coveralls |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would be good to list exactly what would be missing/disabled when this flag is used.
@@ -99,25 +96,16 @@ func NewControllers( | |||
nodeclaimdisruption.NewController(clock, kubeClient, cloudProvider), | |||
nodeclaimhydration.NewController(kubeClient, cloudProvider), | |||
nodehydration.NewController(kubeClient, cloudProvider), | |||
status.NewController[*v1.NodeClaim]( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are these status controllers only responsible for metrics? Anything else would be missing by disabling them? (For example, looks like they also issue transition events ...)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
They do also emit events for finalizers and status condition changes, but I think thats all they emit
This option will disable all of the metrics that are just observing cluster state:
|
@@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ type Options struct { | |||
minValuesPolicyRaw string | |||
MinValuesPolicy MinValuesPolicy | |||
FeatureGates FeatureGates | |||
SimplifiedMetrics bool |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should figure out a more descriptive name than SimplifiedMetrics
. Minimally, I think it should be clear from the name of the flag which metrics we're disabling. I'm thinking we could have something along the lines of DisableClusterStateMetrics
and DisableStatusConditionMetrics
.
Fixes #N/A
Description
Metrics controllers can cause metric scrape timeouts at scale, this adds an optional feature flag to disable them
How was this change tested?
make presubmit
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.